Snapshot gcc-4.9-20160706 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.9-20160706/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.9 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On 6 July 2016 at 22:25, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 5:00 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
>> On 4 July 2016 at 13:51, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 12:58 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
>>> wrote:
Hi,
I have attached a "quick and dirty" prototype patch (va
Hello
I work for Intel on the Intel C++ compiler and we strive to be compatible with
the gnu compiler.
We are processing a source file assuming utf-8 encoding and we see a string
literal with illegal utf-8 encoding, such as an 8-bit character with the high
bit set like 0xa3.
Testing shows that g
CMPXCHG16B is not always available on 64-bit x86 platforms, so 16-byte
naturally aligned atomics are not inlineable. The support functions for
such atomics are free to use lock-free implementation if the instruction
is available on specific platforms.
Except that it is available on almost all 64
Redirecting to the gcc list for discussion.
I'll follow up on that thread directly.
r~
Forwarded Message
Subject:Re: GCC libatomic questions
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 10:27:20 -0700
From: Bin Fan
Organization: Oracle Corporation
To: Richard Henderson
Hello R
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 5:00 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
> On 4 July 2016 at 13:51, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 12:58 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I have attached a "quick and dirty" prototype patch (var-partition-1.diff),
>>> that attempts to partition vari
On 4 July 2016 at 13:51, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 12:58 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I have attached a "quick and dirty" prototype patch (var-partition-1.diff),
>> that attempts to partition variables to reduce number of
>> external references and to increase us
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Sameera Deshpande
wrote:
>
> From: Sameera Deshpande [sameera.deshpa...@imgtec.com]
> Sent: 20 June 2016 11:37:58
> To: Richard Biener
> Cc: Matthew Fortune; Rich Fuhler; Prachi Godbole; gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Jaydeep
> Patil
> S
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Prasad Ghangal wrote:
> On 30 June 2016 at 17:10, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Prasad Ghangal
>> wrote:
>>> On 29 June 2016 at 22:15, Richard Biener wrote:
On June 29, 2016 6:20:29 PM GMT+02:00, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
On 30 June 2016 at 17:10, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Prasad Ghangal
> wrote:
>> On 29 June 2016 at 22:15, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On June 29, 2016 6:20:29 PM GMT+02:00, Prathamesh Kulkarni
>>> wrote:
On 18 June 2016 at 12:02, Prasad Ghangal
wrote:
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
