On 05/23/2016 08:50 PM, Roy Leblanc wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Does GCC's code generator at this point provide protection against ROP and
> JOP attacks? This can be achieved by carefully controlling what opcode bytes
> and immediate values are produced. It can also be achieved by rewriting
> assem
Hello all,
Does GCC's code generator at this point provide protection against ROP and JOP
attacks? This can be achieved by carefully controlling what opcode bytes and
immediate values are produced. It can also be achieved by rewriting assembler
output as you see with the AntiJOP project.
More
On 23 May 2016 at 12:53, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> On 23/05/16 12:36, MM wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> g++ (GCC) 5.3.1 20160406 (Red Hat 5.3.1-6)
>> GNU gold (version 2.25-17.fc23) 1.11
>> I successfully link a executable in debug mode (-std=c++11 -g) but not in
>> release mode (-std=c++11 -flto -O3). All s
On 23/05/16 12:36, MM wrote:
> Hello,
>
> g++ (GCC) 5.3.1 20160406 (Red Hat 5.3.1-6)
> GNU gold (version 2.25-17.fc23) 1.11
> I successfully link a executable in debug mode (-std=c++11 -g) but not in
> release mode (-std=c++11 -flto -O3). All sources are compiled with the same
> option. Shared lib
Hello,
g++ (GCC) 5.3.1 20160406 (Red Hat 5.3.1-6)
GNU gold (version 2.25-17.fc23) 1.11
I successfully link a executable in debug mode (-std=c++11 -g) but not in
release mode (-std=c++11 -flto -O3). All sources are compiled with the same
option. Shared libraries are used.
The compiler driver is use
On 05/23/2016 07:59 AM, zet wrote:
hello, all
just like the title, when gcc support -z keyword?
This seems to be a question for the gcc-help mailing list or a binutils
list.
Anyway, GCC already implements -z by forwarding to the linker (hence the
binutils aspect).
Florian
