Snapshot gcc-6-20160512 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/6-20160512/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 6 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-6
On 05/12/2016 09:27 AM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
I see that the default EH behavior for a biarch mingw-w64 target GCC is
to use SJLJ for the 32-bit multilib and SEH for the 64-bit one, but that
there are #errors in cygming.h and mingw32.h that prevent you from
configuring a biarch build with --dis
I see that the default EH behavior for a biarch mingw-w64 target GCC is
to use SJLJ for the 32-bit multilib and SEH for the 64-bit one, but that
there are #errors in cygming.h and mingw32.h that prevent you from
configuring a biarch build with --disable-sjlj-exceptions to use DWARF-2
and SEH, r
On 12/05/16 12:37, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Claudiu Zissulescu
wrote:
Hi,
I've been trying the following simple test case on latest gcc, and it seems to
produce unwanted unaligned accesses for bit-fields.
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Claudiu Zissulescu
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been trying the following simple test case on latest gcc, and it seems
>> to produce unwanted unaligned accesses for bit-fields.
>>
>> Test cases:
>>
>> struc
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Claudiu Zissulescu
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been trying the following simple test case on latest gcc, and it seems
> to produce unwanted unaligned accesses for bit-fields.
>
> Test cases:
>
> struct lock_chain {
> unsigned int irq_context: 2,
> depth: 6,
>
Hi,
I've been trying the following simple test case on latest gcc, and it seems to
produce unwanted unaligned accesses for bit-fields.
Test cases:
struct lock_chain {
unsigned int irq_context: 2,
depth: 6,
base: 24;
};
struct lock_chain * foo (struct lock_chain *chain)
{
int i;
f
