Need some help regarding bug Bug 38612

2016-02-15 Thread Prasad Ghangal
Hi ! I am trying to fix bug 38612 (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38612). As mentioned in comment 4, I am changing warning message in typeck2.c. TREE_TYPE(datum) gives type as 'X', but I want 'X*' also how to add notes as suggested in the comment ? -- Thanks and Regards, Prasad Gha

Re: gnu-gabi group

2016-02-15 Thread Pedro Alves
On 02/15/2016 08:17 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Frank Ch. Eigler: >> Done [1] [2]. If y'all need a wiki too, just ask. >> >> [1] gnu-g...@sourceware.org >> [2] https://sourceware.org/ml/gnu-gabi/ > > And to subscribe, send mail to . > Somehow, this is missing on the web page above. > One can

Re: gnu-gabi group

2016-02-15 Thread Florian Weimer
* Frank Ch. Eigler: > mark wrote: > >> [...] >>> [...] >>> >> Having a local gnu-gabi group on sourceware.org would be better IMHO. >>> > +1 >>> +1 >> >> Great. I'll ask overseers to create a mailinglist. [...] > > Done [1] [2]. If y'all need a wiki too, just ask. > > [1] gnu-g...@sourceware.org

Re: gnu-gabi group

2016-02-15 Thread Florian Weimer
* Szabolcs Nagy: > you as a group admin can do that, others cannot join > without creating a account at google (which requires > the acceptance of the google tos etc). It should be possible to subscribe to the list by sending an empty email message to . At least it works for me, and I currently

Re: gnu-gabi group

2016-02-15 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Feb 15, 2016, f...@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler) wrote: > mark wrote: >> [...] >>> [...] >>> >> Having a local gnu-gabi group on sourceware.org would be better IMHO. >>> > +1 >>> +1 >> >> Great. I'll ask overseers to create a mailinglist. [...] > Done [1] [2]. If y'all need a wiki too, just

Re: gnu-gabi group

2016-02-15 Thread Mike Frysinger
On 15 Feb 2016 17:17, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Feb 15, 2016, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On 15 Feb 2016 16:18, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > >> they need to allow google to execute javascript code on their > >> machine. > > > complaining that the web interface executes JS is a bit luddite-ish. > > See

Re: gnu-gabi group

2016-02-15 Thread Alexandre Oliva
Mike, On Feb 15, 2016, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On 15 Feb 2016 16:18, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: >> they need to allow google to execute javascript code on their >> machine. > complaining that the web interface executes JS is a bit luddite-ish. See https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/javascript-trap.html

Re: gnu-gabi group

2016-02-15 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Feb 15, 2016, "H.J. Lu" wrote: > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> I, for one, have closed my Google account several Valentine's Days >> ago, for privacy reasons, and this makes the archives of lists hidden >> there unusable for me. > Anyone can subscribe Linux-ABI g

Re: gnu-gabi group

2016-02-15 Thread Joseph Myers
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > they need to allow google to execute javascript code on their > > machine. > > complaining that the web interface executes JS is a bit luddite-ish. If the JS in question is nonfree it's immediately relevant to appropriateness for any GNU project us

Re: gnu-gabi group

2016-02-15 Thread Joseph Myers
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > > Please don't spread false information. Anyone can subscribe Linux-ABI > > group and its archive is to open to everyone. You don't need a gmail > > account > > for any of those. There are quite a few non-gmail users. You don't have > > to take my w

Re: gnu-gabi group (Was: Re: Linux-abi group)

2016-02-15 Thread Joseph Myers
On Sun, 14 Feb 2016, Suprateeka R Hegde wrote: > On 11-Feb-2016 10:08 PM, Joseph Myers wrote: > > I think that none of the ABI extensions in question are anything to do > > with Linux, the kernel. Rather, they are ABI extensions for userspace in > > the GNU system, which apply the same under mult

Re: stable plugin introspection API ... Where?

2016-02-15 Thread David Malcolm
On Mon, 2016-02-15 at 10:27 +0100, Richard Biener wrote: > On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Basile Starynkevitch > wrote: > > Dear all > > > > In https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2016-02/msg00157.html > > > > Richard Biener (richard dot guenther at gmail dot com) is > > mentioning: > > > > > Help wit

Re: gnu-gabi group

2016-02-15 Thread Jose E. Marchesi
> Great. I'll ask overseers to create a mailinglist. [...] Done [1] [2]. If y'all need a wiki too, just ask. [1] gnu-g...@sourceware.org [2] https://sourceware.org/ml/gnu-gabi/ The link to the "GNU GABI project web page" in https://sourceware.org/ml/gnu-gabi is brok

Re: gengtype: conditional GTY ? (to add before GCC 6 release)

2016-02-15 Thread Richard Biener
On February 15, 2016 4:34:48 PM GMT+01:00, Michael Matz wrote: >Hi, > >On Fri, 12 Feb 2016, Richard Biener wrote: > >> >What do you think about refactoring iterators in GCC 7? >> >> I think refactoring towards STL style iterators would be welcome. It > >> may be different for the actual instance

Re: gnu-gabi group

2016-02-15 Thread Frank Ch. Eigler
mark wrote: > [...] >> [...] >> >> Having a local gnu-gabi group on sourceware.org would be better IMHO. >> > +1 >> +1 > > Great. I'll ask overseers to create a mailinglist. [...] Done [1] [2]. If y'all need a wiki too, just ask. [1] gnu-g...@sourceware.org [2] https://sourceware.org/ml/gnu-ga

Re: gnu-gabi group

2016-02-15 Thread Mike Frysinger
On 15 Feb 2016 16:18, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > On 15/02/16 16:03, H.J. Lu wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > >> On Feb 12, 2016, Pedro Alves wrote: > wonderful. I am not a big fan of google groups mailinglists, they seem > to make it hard to subscribe and

Re: gnu-gabi group

2016-02-15 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Mon, 2016-02-15 at 13:37 -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Feb 12, 2016, Pedro Alves wrote: > > > On 02/11/2016 06:20 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote: > >> If we could ask overseers to setup a new group/list gnu-gabi on sourceware > >> where binutils, gcc, gdb, glibc and other interested parties coul

Re: gnu-gabi group

2016-02-15 Thread Jose E. Marchesi
> +1 > > Since it's GNU tools we're talking about, we'd better use a medium that > we've all already agreed to use, than one that a number of us objects > to. I, for one, have closed my Google account several Valentine's Days > ago, for privacy reasons, and this makes the

Re: gnu-gabi group

2016-02-15 Thread Szabolcs Nagy
On 15/02/16 16:03, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> On Feb 12, 2016, Pedro Alves wrote: >> >> wonderful. I am not a big fan of google groups mailinglists, they seem to make it hard to subscribe and don't have easy to access archives. Havin

Re: gnu-gabi group

2016-02-15 Thread H.J. Lu
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Feb 12, 2016, Pedro Alves wrote: > > >>> wonderful. I am not a big fan of google groups mailinglists, they seem >>> to make it hard to subscribe and don't have easy to access archives. >>> Having a local gnu-gabi group on sourceware.org

Re: gnu-gabi group

2016-02-15 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Feb 12, 2016, Pedro Alves wrote: > On 02/11/2016 06:20 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote: >> If we could ask overseers to setup a new group/list gnu-gabi on sourceware >> where binutils, gcc, gdb, glibc and other interested parties could join >> to maintain these extensions and ask for clarifications th

Re: gengtype: conditional GTY ? (to add before GCC 6 release)

2016-02-15 Thread Michael Matz
Hi, On Fri, 12 Feb 2016, Richard Biener wrote: > >What do you think about refactoring iterators in GCC 7? > > I think refactoring towards STL style iterators would be welcome. It > may be different for the actual instances though. Oh God, please, for the live of all kittens, no. If anything,

RE: [Patch] MIPS FDE deletion

2016-02-15 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, Moore, Catherine wrote: > > I saw your patch handles the `fn_stub' case among others and your test case > > included an `__fn_stub_foo' stub too, which is what PR target/53276 is all > > about, which is why I thought it may have been resolved and the existence > > of the PR a

Re: ipa vrp implementation in gcc

2016-02-15 Thread Richard Biener
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Bin.Cheng wrote: > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 12:00 AM, Kugan >>> wrote: >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> >> Another potential use of value ranges is the profile estimation. >>> >> http://www.lighterra.com/papers/valuerang

Switch to ISL 0.16.1

2016-02-15 Thread Richard Biener
Hi, the following patch switches download_prerequesites to use ISL 0.16.1 (just put that into infrastructure/). I've verified it works for me (on the gcc-5 branch and trunk). Ok? Thanks, Richard. Index: contrib/download_prerequisites ===

ANN: gcc-python-plugin 0.15

2016-02-15 Thread David Malcolm
gcc-python-plugin is a plugin for GCC 4.6 onwards which embeds the CPython interpreter within GCC, allowing you to write new compiler warnings in Python, generate code visualizations, etc. It ships with "gcc-with-cpychecker", which implements static analysis passes for GCC aimed at finding bugs in

Re: IPA/cgraph: propagating node frequencies to offloaded functions

2016-02-15 Thread Martin Jambor
Hi, On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 05:40:58PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Hi! > > As I'm touching areas of GCC here, that I have no noteworthy experience > with (IPA optimizations, cgraph), I'm asking for your help. Thanks! > > This is primarily to implement a better "avoid offloading" policy for

Re: stable plugin introspection API ... Where?

2016-02-15 Thread Richard Biener
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Basile Starynkevitch wrote: > Dear all > > In https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2016-02/msg00157.html > > Richard Biener (richard dot guenther at gmail dot com) is mentioning: > >> Help with picking up the partially completed work on a stable plugin >> (introspection) API