Hi !
I am trying to fix bug 38612
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38612).
As mentioned in comment 4, I am changing warning message in
typeck2.c. TREE_TYPE(datum) gives type as 'X', but I want 'X*' also
how to add notes as suggested in the comment ?
--
Thanks and Regards,
Prasad Gha
On 02/15/2016 08:17 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Frank Ch. Eigler:
>> Done [1] [2]. If y'all need a wiki too, just ask.
>>
>> [1] gnu-g...@sourceware.org
>> [2] https://sourceware.org/ml/gnu-gabi/
>
> And to subscribe, send mail to .
> Somehow, this is missing on the web page above.
>
One can
* Frank Ch. Eigler:
> mark wrote:
>
>> [...]
>>> [...]
>>> >> Having a local gnu-gabi group on sourceware.org would be better IMHO.
>>> > +1
>>> +1
>>
>> Great. I'll ask overseers to create a mailinglist. [...]
>
> Done [1] [2]. If y'all need a wiki too, just ask.
>
> [1] gnu-g...@sourceware.org
* Szabolcs Nagy:
> you as a group admin can do that, others cannot join
> without creating a account at google (which requires
> the acceptance of the google tos etc).
It should be possible to subscribe to the list by sending an empty
email message to .
At least it works for me, and I currently
On Feb 15, 2016, f...@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler) wrote:
> mark wrote:
>> [...]
>>> [...]
>>> >> Having a local gnu-gabi group on sourceware.org would be better IMHO.
>>> > +1
>>> +1
>>
>> Great. I'll ask overseers to create a mailinglist. [...]
> Done [1] [2]. If y'all need a wiki too, just
On 15 Feb 2016 17:17, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Feb 15, 2016, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On 15 Feb 2016 16:18, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> >> they need to allow google to execute javascript code on their
> >> machine.
>
> > complaining that the web interface executes JS is a bit luddite-ish.
>
> See
Mike,
On Feb 15, 2016, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 15 Feb 2016 16:18, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
>> they need to allow google to execute javascript code on their
>> machine.
> complaining that the web interface executes JS is a bit luddite-ish.
See https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/javascript-trap.html
On Feb 15, 2016, "H.J. Lu" wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> I, for one, have closed my Google account several Valentine's Days
>> ago, for privacy reasons, and this makes the archives of lists hidden
>> there unusable for me.
> Anyone can subscribe Linux-ABI g
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > they need to allow google to execute javascript code on their
> > machine.
>
> complaining that the web interface executes JS is a bit luddite-ish.
If the JS in question is nonfree it's immediately relevant to
appropriateness for any GNU project us
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> > Please don't spread false information. Anyone can subscribe Linux-ABI
> > group and its archive is to open to everyone. You don't need a gmail
> > account
> > for any of those. There are quite a few non-gmail users. You don't have
> > to take my w
On Sun, 14 Feb 2016, Suprateeka R Hegde wrote:
> On 11-Feb-2016 10:08 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > I think that none of the ABI extensions in question are anything to do
> > with Linux, the kernel. Rather, they are ABI extensions for userspace in
> > the GNU system, which apply the same under mult
On Mon, 2016-02-15 at 10:27 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Basile Starynkevitch
> wrote:
> > Dear all
> >
> > In https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2016-02/msg00157.html
> >
> > Richard Biener (richard dot guenther at gmail dot com) is
> > mentioning:
> >
> > > Help wit
> Great. I'll ask overseers to create a mailinglist. [...]
Done [1] [2]. If y'all need a wiki too, just ask.
[1] gnu-g...@sourceware.org
[2] https://sourceware.org/ml/gnu-gabi/
The link to the "GNU GABI project web page" in
https://sourceware.org/ml/gnu-gabi is brok
On February 15, 2016 4:34:48 PM GMT+01:00, Michael Matz wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On Fri, 12 Feb 2016, Richard Biener wrote:
>
>> >What do you think about refactoring iterators in GCC 7?
>>
>> I think refactoring towards STL style iterators would be welcome. It
>
>> may be different for the actual instance
mark wrote:
> [...]
>> [...]
>> >> Having a local gnu-gabi group on sourceware.org would be better IMHO.
>> > +1
>> +1
>
> Great. I'll ask overseers to create a mailinglist. [...]
Done [1] [2]. If y'all need a wiki too, just ask.
[1] gnu-g...@sourceware.org
[2] https://sourceware.org/ml/gnu-ga
On 15 Feb 2016 16:18, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> On 15/02/16 16:03, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> >> On Feb 12, 2016, Pedro Alves wrote:
> wonderful. I am not a big fan of google groups mailinglists, they seem
> to make it hard to subscribe and
On Mon, 2016-02-15 at 13:37 -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Feb 12, 2016, Pedro Alves wrote:
>
> > On 02/11/2016 06:20 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> >> If we could ask overseers to setup a new group/list gnu-gabi on sourceware
> >> where binutils, gcc, gdb, glibc and other interested parties coul
> +1
>
> Since it's GNU tools we're talking about, we'd better use a medium that
> we've all already agreed to use, than one that a number of us objects
> to. I, for one, have closed my Google account several Valentine's Days
> ago, for privacy reasons, and this makes the
On 15/02/16 16:03, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> On Feb 12, 2016, Pedro Alves wrote:
>>
>>
wonderful. I am not a big fan of google groups mailinglists, they seem
to make it hard to subscribe and don't have easy to access archives.
Havin
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Feb 12, 2016, Pedro Alves wrote:
>
>
>>> wonderful. I am not a big fan of google groups mailinglists, they seem
>>> to make it hard to subscribe and don't have easy to access archives.
>>> Having a local gnu-gabi group on sourceware.org
On Feb 12, 2016, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 02/11/2016 06:20 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
>> If we could ask overseers to setup a new group/list gnu-gabi on sourceware
>> where binutils, gcc, gdb, glibc and other interested parties could join
>> to maintain these extensions and ask for clarifications th
Hi,
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016, Richard Biener wrote:
> >What do you think about refactoring iterators in GCC 7?
>
> I think refactoring towards STL style iterators would be welcome. It
> may be different for the actual instances though.
Oh God, please, for the live of all kittens, no. If anything,
On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, Moore, Catherine wrote:
> > I saw your patch handles the `fn_stub' case among others and your test case
> > included an `__fn_stub_foo' stub too, which is what PR target/53276 is all
> > about, which is why I thought it may have been resolved and the existence
> > of the PR a
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 12:00 AM, Kugan
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> >> Another potential use of value ranges is the profile estimation.
>>> >> http://www.lighterra.com/papers/valuerang
Hi,
the following patch switches download_prerequesites to use ISL 0.16.1
(just put that into infrastructure/).
I've verified it works for me (on the gcc-5 branch and trunk).
Ok?
Thanks,
Richard.
Index: contrib/download_prerequisites
===
gcc-python-plugin is a plugin for GCC 4.6 onwards which embeds the
CPython interpreter within GCC, allowing you to write new compiler
warnings in Python, generate code visualizations, etc.
It ships with "gcc-with-cpychecker", which implements static analysis
passes for GCC aimed at finding bugs in
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 05:40:58PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As I'm touching areas of GCC here, that I have no noteworthy experience
> with (IPA optimizations, cgraph), I'm asking for your help. Thanks!
>
> This is primarily to implement a better "avoid offloading" policy for
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Basile Starynkevitch
wrote:
> Dear all
>
> In https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2016-02/msg00157.html
>
> Richard Biener (richard dot guenther at gmail dot com) is mentioning:
>
>> Help with picking up the partially completed work on a stable plugin
>> (introspection) API
28 matches
Mail list logo