I have a question about the compatibility tests (gcc.dg/compat and
g++.dg/compat). Do they work with remote/simulator testing? I was
trying to run them with qemu and even though I am setting ALT_CC_UNDER_TEST
and ALT_CXX_UNDER_TEST it doesn't look like my alternative compiler
is ever getting run
On 2/1/2016 12:40 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 02/02/2016 01:58 AM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
I think on many targets a clobber "cc" works because the backend
actually defines a register named "cc" to correspond to the flags.
Therefore the normal handling of clobbering named hard registers
catche
On 2/1/2016 6:58 AM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
I think on many targets a clobber "cc" works because the backend
actually defines a register named "cc" to correspond to the flags.
Therefore the normal handling of clobbering named hard registers
catches this case as well.
This doesn't work on i386 bec
Thanks Mikhail and Manuel for the reactions!
Mikhail, thanks for the tip on xmalloc, will take a look if that can
help clean up the plugin code.
Manuel,
0) Yes, we hope to make it faster!
1) Initially coding within GCC would have been too intimidating, but I
think i've started to get a feel for
On 01/02/16 12:34, Bertram, Alexander wrote:
I wanted to share a project we've been working on for sometime within
the context of Renjin,
a new interpreter for the R language running on the JVM.
We basically needed a way to compile C and Fortran code to JVM
classes, and for the last year or two
On 02/02/2016 01:58 AM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
I think on many targets a clobber "cc" works because the backend
actually defines a register named "cc" to correspond to the flags.
Therefore the normal handling of clobbering named hard registers
catches this case as well.
Yes. C.f. Sparc ADDITION
On 02/01/2016 12:07 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
"Bin.Cheng" writes:
Seems to me Andrew was right in comment of PR69559, that we simply
couldn't bootstrap GCC with sysroot.
The main use of sysroot is to build a cross compiler, which you cannot
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> "Bin.Cheng" writes:
>
>> Seems to me Andrew was right in comment of PR69559, that we simply
>> couldn't bootstrap GCC with sysroot.
>
> The main use of sysroot is to build a cross compiler, which you cannot
> bootstrap anyway.
>
>> My questi
"Bin.Cheng" writes:
> Seems to me Andrew was right in comment of PR69559, that we simply
> couldn't bootstrap GCC with sysroot.
The main use of sysroot is to build a cross compiler, which you cannot
bootstrap anyway.
> My question here is: If this is the case, how should I bootstrap a gcc
> aga
Hi,
Recently I tried to bootstrap gcc against new glibc but failed. What
I want to do is just bootstrap gcc against local version glibc other
than system one, because I can't update glibc in that system.
I tried this by configuring GCC using "--with-build-sysroot" or
"--with-sysroot" or both, but
On 02/01/2016 03:34 PM, Bertram, Alexander wrote:
> I wanted to share a project we've been working on for sometime within
> the context of Renjin,
> a new interpreter for the R language running on the JVM.
>
> We basically needed a way to compile C and Fortran code to JVM
> classes, and for the la
Hello,
I have write, open and read statements in a fortran program and compile as,
gfortran -c test.f90
and create a dll with
gfortran -shared test.dll -o test.o
I import this dll in C# with dllimport and call one of the routine. After
the call the program hangs on write(*,*) statement.
May I
David Wohlferd wrote:
> On 1/26/2016 4:31 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> > On 01/27/2016 12:12 AM, David Wohlferd wrote:
> >> I started by just commenting out the code in ix86_md_asm_adjust that
> >> unconditionally clobbered the flags. I figured this would allow the
> >> 'normal' "cc" handling to occ
I wanted to share a project we've been working on for sometime within
the context of Renjin,
a new interpreter for the R language running on the JVM.
We basically needed a way to compile C and Fortran code to JVM
classes, and for the last year or two we've been working on tool chain
that's compose
On 1/26/2016 4:31 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 01/27/2016 12:12 AM, David Wohlferd wrote:
I started by just commenting out the code in ix86_md_asm_adjust that
unconditionally clobbered the flags. I figured this would allow the
'normal' "cc" handling to occur. But apparently there is no 'normal'
15 matches
Mail list logo