On 01/07/2016 11:56 PM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 07/01/16 14:22, Will Deacon wrote:
Akashi,
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 04:57:54PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
I'm the author of ftrace support on arm64(aarch64) linux. As part of
ftrace, we can utilize "stack tracer" which reports the ma
Since this is still a problem with new versions of GCC would it be
welcomed if i tried making a solution that generated a switch statement
where ever a big list of || expressions would be generated?
I have a solution now that does generate a working switch but the
formatting of completely off
On 01/06/2016 07:46 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
Would it be possible to add an option -mveclibabi=glibc to cater for
this *for all languages*; or is this too low level (after all, the glibc
libmvec has code for multiple architectures). If so, at what level
should this be implemented ?
It doesn't loo
On 01/05/2016 09:34 PM, Nguyễn Sinh Ngọc wrote:
Now, I'm planning to make a GCC port for a new 8 bits
microcontroller. And I want to add it into official GCC source. But
the normal account not have the privilege to add a new target through
git.
Can you tell me how to do this?
Develop your port,
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
> Hi Bin,
>
>
> On 07/01/16 14:15, Bin.Cheng wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> Below test is supposed to be compiled and run, but we failed to link
>> the binary with tiny memory model.
>>
>> spawn
>> /data/work/build-aarch64_be-none-elf/obj/gcc2/gcc/testsui
Hi Bin,
On 07/01/16 14:15, Bin.Cheng wrote:
Hi,
Below test is supposed to be compiled and run, but we failed to link
the binary with tiny memory model.
spawn
/data/work/build-aarch64_be-none-elf/obj/gcc2/gcc/testsuite/g++14/../../xg++
-B/data/work/build-aarch64_be-none-elf/obj/gcc2/gcc/testsui
On 7 January 2016 at 13:14, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 6 January 2016 at 21:05, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> I have been meaning to try solving it in libstdc++ with a new
>> that includes the libc one and extends it, to see how well that works.
>> I haven't had time to try that, so it would be prema
