Re: inline asm and multi-alternative constraints

2015-11-06 Thread David Wohlferd
On 11/6/2015 4:46 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 03:29:43PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote: It's never easy to predict whether or not something like this will be contentious. Worst case is you post, it's contentious, we iterate a bit and reach some kind of resolution (ok, worst ca

Re: inline asm and multi-alternative constraints

2015-11-06 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 03:29:43PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote: > It's never easy to predict whether or not something like this will be > contentious. Worst case is you post, it's contentious, we iterate a bit > and reach some kind of resolution (ok, worst case is no resolution is > reached, but that

Re: inline asm and multi-alternative constraints

2015-11-06 Thread Jeff Law
On 11/02/2015 11:30 PM, David Wohlferd wrote: I think the fundamental problem here is we ought not be exposing those modifiers to the user. They're inherently tied to the details of the register allocation and reloading passes. This is what I'm thinking as well. I agree. The only reason I d