Snapshot gcc-6-20150823 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/6-20150823/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 6 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk revision
DJ Delorie :
>
> > In the mean time, I'm enclosing a contributor map that will need to be
> > filled in whoever does the conversion. The right sides should become
> > full names and preferred email addresses.
>
> This information should be gleanable from the Changelog commits...
> do you have a
> In the mean time, I'm enclosing a contributor map that will need to be
> filled in whoever does the conversion. The right sides should become
> full names and preferred email addresses.
This information should be gleanable from the Changelog commits...
do you have a script to scan those?
Markus Trippelsdorf :
> On 2015.08.23 at 11:36 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 12:26:25PM -0400, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> > > One way to do it would be to mine the list archives for not just names
> > > but name-date pairs. With a little scripting work that could be pro
Segher Boessenkool :
> On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 12:26:25PM -0400, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> > One way to do it would be to mine the list archives for not just names
> > but name-date pairs. With a little scripting work that could be processed
> > into a sequence of map files, each one valid for a kno
On 2015.08.23 at 11:36 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 12:26:25PM -0400, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> > One way to do it would be to mine the list archives for not just names
> > but name-date pairs. With a little scripting work that could be processed
> > into a sequence of
Florian Weimer writes:
> Okay, it's not a big deal for me if my older contributions are
> attributed to Red Hat. I was just wondering.
Since subversion doesn't store author names, only committer names, the
real attributions are in the ChangeLog anyway.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linu
On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 12:26:25PM -0400, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> One way to do it would be to mine the list archives for not just names
> but name-date pairs. With a little scripting work that could be processed
> into a sequence of map files, each one valid for a known span of dates. The
> only
Florian Weimer :
> * Eric S. Raymond:
>
> > Florian Weimer :
> >> Thanks for your offer for working on this. (I actually brought up
> >> your name at the Cauldron. :)
> >>
> >> Can your tools handle changes in preferred email addresses over time?
> >
> > It would in theory be possible to do this
* Eric S. Raymond:
> Florian Weimer :
>> Thanks for your offer for working on this. (I actually brought up
>> your name at the Cauldron. :)
>>
>> Can your tools handle changes in preferred email addresses over time?
>
> It would in theory be possible to do this with multiple applications
> of th
Florian Weimer :
> Thanks for your offer for working on this. (I actually brought up
> your name at the Cauldron. :)
>
> Can your tools handle changes in preferred email addresses over time?
It would in theory be possible to do this with multiple applications
of the reposurgeon "authors read" co
* Eric S. Raymond:
> In the mean time, I'm enclosing a contributor map that will need to be
> filled in whoever does the conversion. The right sides should become
> full names and preferred email addresses.
Thanks for your offer for working on this. (I actually brought up
your name at the Cauld
I learned on G+ that there's discussion of moving the GCC repository
to git going on. Some of you might already be aware that I did both
the groff CVS -> git conversion and the Emacs bzr -> git conversion,
and am pretty much the go-to guy for high-quality conversions of
important projects. Since
13 matches
Mail list logo
