>>> On 15.07.15 at 03:20, wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 10:13:06AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> (there doesn't seem
>> to be a fix for this in gcc trunk either, which I originally expected I could
>> simply backport).
>
> The configure.in->configure.ac rename happened over a year ago so I
> gu
On July 14, 2015 10:36:11 PM GMT+02:00, Janne Blomqvist
wrote:
>On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Richard Biener
>wrote:
>>
>> A second release candidate for GCC 5.2 is available from
>>
>> ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/5.2.0-RC-20150712
>>
>> and shortly its mirrors. It has been generat
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 7:00 PM, wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Jul 15, 2015, at 9:20 AM, Alan Modra wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 10:13:06AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> Alan, gcc maintainers,
>>>
>>> I was quite surprised for my gcc 4.9.3 build (using binutils 2.25 instead
>>> of 2.24 as I had in
> On Jul 15, 2015, at 9:20 AM, Alan Modra wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 10:13:06AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Alan, gcc maintainers,
>>
>> I was quite surprised for my gcc 4.9.3 build (using binutils 2.25 instead
>> of 2.24 as I had in use with 4.9.2) to fail in rather obscure ways. Q
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 10:13:06AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Alan, gcc maintainers,
>
> I was quite surprised for my gcc 4.9.3 build (using binutils 2.25 instead
> of 2.24 as I had in use with 4.9.2) to fail in rather obscure ways. Quite
> a bit of digging resulted in me finding that gcc/configu
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> A second release candidate for GCC 5.2 is available from
>
> ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/5.2.0-RC-20150712
>
> and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 225717.
>
> I have sofar bootstrapped the release ca
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 10:08 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> Combined tree is useful when the latest binutils is needed by GCC.
If you build and install binutils using the same --prefix as used for
gcc, then gcc will automatically find that binutils and use it. You
don't need combined trees to make this w
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Jim Wilson wrote:
> On 07/14/2015 02:13 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> I was quite surprised for my gcc 4.9.3 build (using binutils 2.25 instead
>> of 2.24 as I had in use with 4.9.2) to fail in rather obscure ways.
>
> in-tree/combined-tree builds aren't recommended a
On 07/14/2015 02:13 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> I was quite surprised for my gcc 4.9.3 build (using binutils 2.25 instead
> of 2.24 as I had in use with 4.9.2) to fail in rather obscure ways.
in-tree/combined-tree builds aren't recommended anymore, and hence
aren't well maintained anymore. That is a
-Original Message-
From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 6:35 PM
To: Ajit Kumar Agarwal
Cc: Jeff Law; Jan Hubicka; gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Vinod Kathail; Shail Aditya Gupta;
Vidhumouli Hunsigida; Nagaraju Mekala
Subject: Re: Traces on Data Depend
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 04:31:16PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 06/25/2015 08:28 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> > Sorry in advance for inviting a bikeshed discussion, but while making
> > the hashing changes that I just committed, I noticed that the C++ification
> > has been done in a variety of
On 06/25/2015 08:28 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Sorry in advance for inviting a bikeshed discussion, but while making
> the hashing changes that I just committed, I noticed that the C++ification
> has been done in a variety of different styles. I ended up having to follow
> the "do what the sur
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Ajit Kumar Agarwal
wrote:
> All:
>
> I am wondering how useful to form the traces on Data Dependency Graph. On top
> of the traces in the Control flow graph,
> I was thinking of forming the traces on data Dependency graph(DDG).
>
> Would this helps in further
All:
I am wondering how useful to form the traces on Data Dependency Graph. On top
of the traces in the Control flow graph,
I was thinking of forming the traces on data Dependency graph(DDG).
Would this helps in further vectorization and parallelization candidates.
Thoughts?
Thanks & Regar
All:
I am trying the place the following Analysis in the vectorizer of GCC that
helps in improving the vectorizer to a great extent
For the unit stride, zero stride and non stride accesses of memory that helps
in vectorizer.
For the Data Dependency graph, the topological sort is performed. The
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 11:39 PM, Abe wrote:
>> The GIMPLE level if-conversion code was purely
>> written to make loops suitable for vectorization.
>
>
> I`m not surprised to read that.
>
>
>> It wasn't meant to provide if-conversion of
>> scalar code in the end (even though it does).
>
>
> Seren
Alan, gcc maintainers,
I was quite surprised for my gcc 4.9.3 build (using binutils 2.25 instead
of 2.24 as I had in use with 4.9.2) to fail in rather obscure ways. Quite
a bit of digging resulted in me finding that gcc/configure.ac looks for
configure.in in a number of binutils subtrees. Globally
17 matches
Mail list logo
