gcc@gcc.gnu.org

2015-06-06 Thread Steven
Hi Mikhail, Thanks for the comments. I haven't updated my GDB yet and I will test it again once I have a newer version GDB. Yuhang On 06/06/2015 09:31 PM, Mikhail Maltsev wrote: On 07.06.2015 0:15, steven...@gmail.com wrote: Dear GCC developers, I have successfully compiled & installed GC

gcc@gcc.gnu.org

2015-06-06 Thread Mikhail Maltsev
On 07.06.2015 0:15, steven...@gmail.com wrote: > Dear GCC developers, > > I have successfully compiled & installed GCC 4.9.2. Could you comment on the > results of 'make check' (see below). Here is the relevant information: > You can verify it against published test results: https://www.gnu.org/

Re: debug-early branch merged into mainline

2015-06-06 Thread Jan Hubicka
> > On 06/06/2015 03:33 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote: > > >Aldy, > > >also at PPC64le LTO bootstrap (at gcc112) dies with: > > >^ > > >0x104ae8f7 check_die > > > ../../gcc/dwarf2out.c:5715 > > > > Hmmm... this is in the LTO/ltrans stage? If so, that's weird. The > > LTO path does not do the ear

Re: debug-early branch merged into mainline

2015-06-06 Thread Jan Hubicka
> On 06/06/2015 03:33 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote: > >Aldy, > >also at PPC64le LTO bootstrap (at gcc112) dies with: > >^ > >0x104ae8f7 check_die > > ../../gcc/dwarf2out.c:5715 > > Hmmm... this is in the LTO/ltrans stage? If so, that's weird. The > LTO path does not do the early DIE dance. Sin

Re: debug-early branch merged into mainline

2015-06-06 Thread Aldy Hernandez
On 06/06/2015 05:47 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote: On 06/06/2015 03:33 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote: Aldy, also at PPC64le LTO bootstrap (at gcc112) dies with: ^ 0x104ae8f7 check_die ../../gcc/dwarf2out.c:5715 Hmmm... this is in the LTO/ltrans stage? If so, that's weird. The LTO path does not d

Re: debug-early branch merged into mainline

2015-06-06 Thread Aldy Hernandez
On 06/06/2015 03:33 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote: Aldy, also at PPC64le LTO bootstrap (at gcc112) dies with: ^ 0x104ae8f7 check_die ../../gcc/dwarf2out.c:5715 Hmmm... this is in the LTO/ltrans stage? If so, that's weird. The LTO path does not do the early DIE dance. Since check_die() is a

gcc@gcc.gnu.org

2015-06-06 Thread stevenyhw
Dear GCC developers, I have successfully compiled & installed GCC 4.9.2. Could you comment on the results of 'make check' (see below). Here is the relevant information: 1. config.guess x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu 2. gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=/Scr/scr-test-steven/ins

Re: debug-early branch merged into mainline

2015-06-06 Thread Jan Hubicka
Aldy, also at PPC64le LTO bootstrap (at gcc112) dies with: ^ 0x104ae8f7 check_die ../../gcc/dwarf2out.c:5715 0x104e4e1b dwarf2out_decl ../../gcc/dwarf2out.c:21886 0x104d8a87 dwarf2out_abstract_function ../../gcc/dwarf2out.c:18457 0x104dd3e7 gen_inlined_subroutine_die

Re: debug-early branch merged into mainline

2015-06-06 Thread Aldy Hernandez
On 06/06/2015 09:20 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote: Aldy Hernandez writes: Does the attached fix the ia64 failure? commit 6c40c8f011bbd09ea92749f3925db83f249baf74 Author: Aldy Hernandez Date: Sat Jun 6 06:48:40 2015 -0400 * dwarf2out.c (gen_lexical_block_die): Initialize stmt_die. Yes

Re: debug-early branch merged into mainline

2015-06-06 Thread Andreas Schwab
Andreas Schwab writes: > FAIL: gcc.dg/autopar/pr46885.c (test for excess errors) > Excess errors: > xgcc: error: > /daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20150606/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/autopar/pr46885.c: > -fcompare-debug failure As it turned out, this is a fallout from a different c

Re: Static Chain Register on iOS AArch64

2015-06-06 Thread Richard Earnshaw
On 05/06/15 16:55, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 06/04/2015 03:40 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote: >> The static chain register is pretty much private to a translation unit... > > That was true when the static chain was restricted to trampolines. > Since Go has started using it for cross-translation-u

Re: debug-early branch merged into mainline

2015-06-06 Thread Andreas Schwab
Aldy Hernandez writes: > Does the attached fix the ia64 failure? > > commit 6c40c8f011bbd09ea92749f3925db83f249baf74 > Author: Aldy Hernandez > Date: Sat Jun 6 06:48:40 2015 -0400 > > * dwarf2out.c (gen_lexical_block_die): Initialize stmt_die. Yes, it does. Thanks, Andreas. -- Andrea

Re: Builtin expansion versus headers optimization: Reductions

2015-06-06 Thread Ondřej Bílka
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 12:55:04PM +0400, Mikhail Maltsev wrote: > 05.06.2015 13:02, Ondřej Bílka writes: > > Also as I mentioned bugs before gcc now doesn't handle alignment well so > > it doesn't optimize following to zero for aligned code. > > > > align = ((uintptr_t) x) % 16; > > > That is b

Re: debug-early branch merged into mainline

2015-06-06 Thread Aldy Hernandez
On 06/06/2015 05:49 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote: Bootstrap fails on aarch64: Comparing stages 2 and 3 warning: gcc/cc1objplus-checksum.o differs warning: gcc/cc1obj-checksum.o differs warning: gcc/cc1plus-checksum.o differs warning: gcc/cc1-checksum.o differs Bootstrap comparison failure! gcc/ira-c

Re: debug-early branch merged into mainline

2015-06-06 Thread Andreas Schwab
Bootstrap fails on aarch64: Comparing stages 2 and 3 warning: gcc/cc1objplus-checksum.o differs warning: gcc/cc1obj-checksum.o differs warning: gcc/cc1plus-checksum.o differs warning: gcc/cc1-checksum.o differs Bootstrap comparison failure! gcc/ira-costs.o differs gcc/tree-sra.o differs gcc/tree-p

Re: debug-early branch merged into mainline

2015-06-06 Thread Andreas Schwab
:const|volatile|atomic|restrict)_type 8 I'm also seeing this: FAIL: gcc.dg/autopar/pr46885.c (test for excess errors) Excess errors: xgcc: error: /daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20150606/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/autopar/pr46885.c: -fcompare-debug failure Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.o

Re: debug-early branch merged into mainline

2015-06-06 Thread Richard Biener
On June 5, 2015 9:06:01 PM GMT+02:00, Aldy Hernandez wrote: >The debug-early work has been merged into mainline. > >There is a known Ada failure which Eric B. knows about and approved, >and >for which there is an appropriate FIXME note in the Ada sources: > >+FAIL: gnat.dg/specs/debug1.ads scan-a