On 05/25/2015 09:27 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
2015-05-22 15:01 GMT+03:00 Ilya Enkovich :
2015-05-22 11:53 GMT+03:00 Ilya Enkovich :
2015-05-21 22:08 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Makarov :
So, Ilya, to solve the problem you need to avoid sharing subregs for the
correct LRA/reload work.
Thanks a lot fo
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 07:08:35PM +0200, Torvald Riegel wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 17:55 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > http://www.rdrop.com/users/paulmck/RCU/consume.2015.05.18a.pdf
>
> I have been discussing Section 7.9 with Paul during last week.
>
> While I think that 7.9 helps
Snapshot gcc-5-20150526 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/5-20150526/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 5 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-5
On Thu, 2015-05-21 at 13:42 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Paul E. McKenney
> wrote:
> >
> > The compiler can (and does) speculate non-atomic non-volatile writes
> > in some cases, but I do not believe that it is permitted to speculate
> > either volatile or atomic
On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 17:55 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> http://www.rdrop.com/users/paulmck/RCU/consume.2015.05.18a.pdf
I have been discussing Section 7.9 with Paul during last week.
While I think that 7.9 helps narrow down the problem somewhat, I'm still
concerned that it effectively
On Tue, 19 May 2015, Martin Liška wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I've just noticed that we, for default configuration, produce just 30
> partitions.
> I'm wondering whether that's fine, or it would be necessary to re-tune
> partitioning
> algorithm to produce better balanced map?
>
> Attached patch is used
