Re: Q.: inconsistent (?) warnings about functions called through non-compatible types

2015-03-30 Thread Mikhail Maltsev
29.03.2015 23:18, Godmar Back writes: > Thanks. I'm a bit confused then what constitutes defined & undefined behavior. > > The actual situation I encountered is best described by this example: > > -- > /* Tested with gcc 4.4.7 and 4.8.2 -m32 */ > #include > #include > > bool boolFunctionThatRe

Re: [website, changes] (was: Re: warning about const multidimensional array as function parameter)

2015-03-30 Thread Manuel López-Ibáñez
Done! On 30 March 2015 at 23:23, Martin Uecker wrote: > > Hi Manuel, > > sorry for the late reply, I was travelling last week. > My account name is: MartinUecker > > Martin > > > Manuel López-Ibáñez : > >> Martin, >> >> did you manage to create a wiki account? >> >> I can add you to the editors g

RE: Proposal for adding splay_tree_find (to find elements without updating the nodes).

2015-03-30 Thread Aditya K
So I have modified the patch to use hash_map instead of std::map. The patch is attached. However, I got one regression after that. # Comparing directories ## Dir1=../build-pristine/: 11 sum files ## Dir2=../build-test/: 11 sum files # Comparing 11 common sum files ## /bin/sh ../contrib/compare_

Re: [website, changes] (was: Re: warning about const multidimensional array as function parameter)

2015-03-30 Thread Martin Uecker
Hi Manuel, sorry for the late reply, I was travelling last week. My account name is: MartinUecker Martin Manuel López-Ibáñez : > Martin, > > did you manage to create a wiki account? > > I can add you to the editors group then. > > On 27 January 2015 at 22:54, Martin Uecker wrote: > > Am T

Re: Fixing inconsistent uses of address costs

2015-03-30 Thread Kyrill Tkachov
On 30/03/15 08:14, Bin.Cheng wrote: On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 1:31 AM, Sandra Loosemore wrote: On 03/27/2015 03:43 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: On 27/03/15 03:29, Bin.Cheng wrote: [much snippage] As for tree ivopts, address cost is used in both ways. For any address computation that's invalid

Selecting an architecture tuple for the Rumprun toolchain

2015-03-30 Thread Martin Lucina
Hi All, I'm working on selecting the right architecture tuple for the Rumprun toolchain[1] to use as a prefix for naming the cross tools and for passing to application build systems (autoconf, CMake, ...). Rumprun is a software stack built with Rump Kernels[2] which enables running existing POSIX

Re: Question about Gimple FE

2015-03-30 Thread Richard Biener
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 4:00 PM, xue yinsong wrote: >> Thanks for your reply to my proposal. >> AFAIS, most of the files generated by -fdump-tree-all are presented in >> C-like form instead >> of in lisp-like tuple form. >> So it’s better

Re: Fixing inconsistent uses of address costs

2015-03-30 Thread Kyrill Tkachov
On 30/03/15 08:07, Bin.Cheng wrote: On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: On 27/03/15 03:29, Bin.Cheng wrote: On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:40 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: Hi all, I'd like to attempt to make GCC's usage of costs in the backends consistent. We have a lot of diffe

Re: Fixing inconsistent uses of address costs

2015-03-30 Thread Kyrill Tkachov
On 27/03/15 17:31, Sandra Loosemore wrote: On 03/27/2015 03:43 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: On 27/03/15 03:29, Bin.Cheng wrote: [much snippage] As for tree ivopts, address cost is used in both ways. For any address computation that's invalid, it tries to legitimize it into two parts, the first

Re: Question about Gimple FE

2015-03-30 Thread Richard Biener
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 4:00 PM, xue yinsong wrote: > Thanks for your reply to my proposal. > AFAIS, most of the files generated by -fdump-tree-all are presented in C-like > form instead > of in lisp-like tuple form. > So it’s better to implement a front end for the C-like gimple representations.

Re: Fixing inconsistent uses of address costs

2015-03-30 Thread Bin.Cheng
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 1:31 AM, Sandra Loosemore wrote: > On 03/27/2015 03:43 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: >> >> >> On 27/03/15 03:29, Bin.Cheng wrote: >>> >>> [much snippage] >>> >>> >>> As for tree ivopts, address cost is used in both ways. For any >>> address computation that's invalid, it tries

Re: Fixing inconsistent uses of address costs

2015-03-30 Thread Bin.Cheng
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: > > On 27/03/15 03:29, Bin.Cheng wrote: >> >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:40 PM, Kyrill Tkachov >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I'd like to attempt to make GCC's usage of costs in the backends >>> consistent. >>> We have a lot of different t