On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:09:28PM +0800, xue yinsong wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> On 15/3/18 下午10:08, "Diego Novillo" wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 2:54 AM, xue yinsong wrote:
> >
> >> Somehow this project is not in the gsoc ideas list, and it’s been one year
> >> since the last commit(Accord
Snapshot gcc-4.9-20150318 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.9-20150318/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.9 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
If you move the call to rest_of_decl_compilation we could go through and
prune the debug info for unused decls at dwarf2out_finish time, the way
we do with unused types.
Jason
Gentlemen:
Since we pick global symbols to be emitted early from the symbol table,
we miss out on DECL_EXTERNAL's because they never appear in the symbol
table:
[rest_of_decl_compilation]:
else if (TREE_CODE (decl) == VAR_DECL && !DECL_EXTERNAL (decl)
&& TREE_STATIC (decl))
v
On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 22:31 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> I'm not a big fan of keeping the FOR_EACH_blah style iterator and would
> prefer to use real C++ iterators. But it ought to give you some ideas
> about how to start breaking these things out.
BTW I've tried to propose to start doing that (us
> Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 22:01:18 +0530
> Subject: Re: Proposal for adding splay_tree_find (to find elements without
> updating the nodes).
> From: prathamesh.kulka...@linaro.org
> To: hiradi...@msn.com
> CC: richard.guent...@gmail.com; tbsau...@tbsaunde.
Thnaks to your explanation I found a way to do it:
1) Duplicate the blocks
2) Fix cfg, phis, and dominators
3) manually call update_ssa
4) Edit rhs uses
By doing 4) after 3) subsequent calls to update_ssa, do not alter the operands
anymore.
On 17 Mar 2015, at 20:10, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 03/17
On 18 March 2015 at 21:20, Aditya K wrote:
>
>
>
>> Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 11:50:16 +0100
>> Subject: Re: Proposal for adding splay_tree_find (to find elements without
>> updating the nodes).
>> From: richard.guent...@gmail.com
>> To: hiradi...@msn.com
>>
> Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 11:50:16 +0100
> Subject: Re: Proposal for adding splay_tree_find (to find elements without
> updating the nodes).
> From: richard.guent...@gmail.com
> To: hiradi...@msn.com
> CC: tbsau...@tbsaunde.org; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
>
> On Mon,
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:09 AM, xue yinsong wrote:
> I’m glad to get started now.
> Could you please give me some specific directions to work on ?
Sorry. I wasn't clear enough. You'd first need to find someone willing
to mentor. I'm not going to be involved in GSoC for GCC this year.
Diego.
On 15/3/18 下午10:08, "Diego Novillo" wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 2:54 AM, xue yinsong wrote:
>
>> Somehow this project is not in the gsoc ideas list, and it’s been one year
>> since the last commit(According to
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gimple-front-end/ChangeLog).
>>
>>
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 2:54 AM, xue yinsong wrote:
> Somehow this project is not in the gsoc ideas list, and it’s been one year
> since the last commit(According to
> https://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gimple-front-end/ChangeLog).
>
> Could someone tell me if this project is still active and
Martin,
did you manage to create a wiki account?
I can add you to the editors group then.
On 27 January 2015 at 22:54, Martin Uecker wrote:
> Am Tue, 27 Jan 2015 15:15:08 -0500
> "Frank Ch. Eigler" :
>
>> Hi -
>>
>> > > thank you, I tried creating an account, but it said: Unknown action
>> > >
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 4:33 AM, Aditya K wrote:
>
>
>
>> Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 02:32:23 -0400
>> From: tbsau...@tbsaunde.org
>> To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
>> Subject: Re: Proposal for adding splay_tree_find (to find elements without
>> updating the nodes).
>>
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
