On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 03:33:18AM +, Aditya K wrote:
>
>
>
> > Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 02:32:23 -0400
> > From: tbsau...@tbsaunde.org
> > To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> > Subject: Re: Proposal for adding splay_tree_find (to find elements without
> > updating t
> Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 02:32:23 -0400
> From: tbsau...@tbsaunde.org
> To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Proposal for adding splay_tree_find (to find elements without
> updating the nodes).
>
> hi,
>
> I'm only commenting on algorithmic stuff at this po
>
> But GDB features a useful custom expression operator '@':
> https://sourceware.org/gdb/onlinedocs/gdb/Arrays.html
>
> I have problems implementing '@' into GCC, could you suggest at which place
> should I call build_array_type_nelts()? Or is it the right way at all?
>
> Testing it on a sam
Hi, all.
Currently GCC allows dynamic plugins to register custom attributes and
pragmas. I would like to propose to add API for registering custom
built-in functions.
AFAIK, current plugin API can be used to emulate this feature, for
example by creating a function declaration in PLUGIN_START_UNIT
Snapshot gcc-5-20150315 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/5-20150315/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 5 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk revision
Hi,
based on the GCC libcc1 plugin GDB will implement GDB command 'compile print'
equivalent to default 'print' but evaluating the expression by GCC:
https://github.com/tromey/gdb/tree/pmuldoon/compile/print
It is currently done by compiling a .c->.o file and checking its DWARF for the
ty
15.03.2015 17:44, Ajit Kumar Agarwal writes:
>
> Hello All:
>
> The below example is taken from the article by Albert Cohen et.al.
>
> "Deep Jam : Conversion of Coarse grain Parallelism to Fine grain vector
> parallelism"
It is not clear from this article, whether such optimization can be
impl
-Original Message-
From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2015 9:30 PM
To: Ajit Kumar Agarwal; Jeff Law; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Vinod Kathail; Shail Aditya Gupta; Vidhumouli Hunsigida; Nagaraju Mekala
Subject: RE: Short Circuit compiler transformati
On March 15, 2015 3:44:39 PM GMT+01:00, Ajit Kumar Agarwal
wrote:
>
>Hello All:
>
>Below examples are the transformation for the given loop in Fig(1).
>Fig(2) unroll and jam and the Fig(3) does the
>Code motion to bring two IF adjacent to each other and two while loops
>adjacent to each other.
>
On March 15, 2015 11:14:59 AM GMT+01:00, Ajit Kumar Agarwal
wrote:
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of
>Ajit Kumar Agarwal
>Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2015 3:35 PM
>To: Richard Biener; Jeff Law; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
>Cc: Vinod Kathail;
Hello All:
Below examples are the transformation for the given loop in Fig(1). Fig(2)
unroll and jam and the Fig(3) does the
Code motion to bring two IF adjacent to each other and two while loops adjacent
to each other.
The Fig(4 ) does the IF-merging and the Loop fusion on the transformed Loo
-Original Message-
From: Jan Hubicka [mailto:hubi...@ucw.cz]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 10:34 PM
To: Ajit Kumar Agarwal
Cc: hubi...@ucw.cz; gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Vinod Kathail; Shail Aditya Gupta;
Vidhumouli Hunsigida; Nagaraju Mekala
Subject: Re: Function outlining and partial Inlini
-Original Message-
From: gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Ajit
Kumar Agarwal
Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2015 3:35 PM
To: Richard Biener; Jeff Law; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Vinod Kathail; Shail Aditya Gupta; Vidhumouli Hunsigida; Nagaraju Mekala
Subject: RE: Short
-Original Message-
From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2015 3:05 PM
To: Ajit Kumar Agarwal; Jeff Law; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Vinod Kathail; Shail Aditya Gupta; Vidhumouli Hunsigida; Nagaraju Mekala
Subject: Re: Short Circuit compiler transformati
On March 15, 2015 9:15:36 AM GMT+01:00, Ajit Kumar Agarwal
wrote:
>Hello All:
>
>Short circuit compiler transformation for conditional branches. The
>conditional branches based on the conditional
>Expressions one of the path is always executed thus short circuiting
>the path. Certains values of t
Hello All:
Short circuit compiler transformation for conditional branches. The conditional
branches based on the conditional
Expressions one of the path is always executed thus short circuiting the path.
Certains values of the conditional
Expressions makes the conditional expressions always true
16 matches
Mail list logo
