> So far I've been testing with hardware but I'm pretty sure I read
> somewhere about an RL78 simulator, which would be a useful addition.
> Does this simulator exist, and if so, how do I run the tests against it?
The simulator is part of the GDB build.
> I tried 'make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="-
> In our ARC port, we found the following situation after expand:
>
> (insn 23 22 24 5 (set (reg:SI 176)
> (subreg:SI (mem/c:DI (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 147 virtual-stack-vars)
> (const_int -268 [0xfef4])) [3
> tmpoutst.st_size+0 S8 A32]) 4)) t02.c:64 -1 (nil))
>
Hi Vladmir,
I think that IRA should give the same result with the same RTL
input. But I find that this is not always true.
I test IRA with two inputs, say X and Y. The RTL insns are the
same (ignore the UIDs). And the only difference between the two is the
CFG.
There are two blocks in
Hi,
In our ARC port, we found the following situation after expand:
(insn 23 22 24 5 (set (reg:SI 176)
(subreg:SI (mem/c:DI (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 147 virtual-stack-vars)
(const_int -268 [0xfef4])) [3
tmpoutst.st_size+0 S8 A32]) 4)) t02.c:64 -1
(nil))
Th
On 03/31/2014 10:10 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Tobias Grosser wrote:
On 03/31/2014 06:25 AM, Vladimir Kargov wrote:
Regarding this bug there are two directions to go:
1) It is necessary to understand if we need to do wrapping on the result of
number_of_latch_exe
On 03/31/2014 05:44 AM, dw wrote:
> So, after looking over this discussion, I have updated the text. This
> time no undefined terms, while still conveying all the points I had in mind:
>
> The "memory" clobber tells the compiler that the assembly code performs
> memory reads or writes to items o
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Tobias Grosser wrote:
> On 03/31/2014 06:25 AM, Vladimir Kargov wrote:
>>
>> On 27 March 2014 18:39, Mircea Namolaru wrote:
>>>
>>> The domain is computed on basis of the information provided by
>>> number_of_latch_execution that returns the tree expression
>>>
>>
