Re: wide-int and int_traits::decompose getting a precision arg

2013-10-16 Thread Richard Sandiford
Richard Biener writes: > When investigating the code-bloat / slowness of wide-ints I noticed > that when creating a wide_int_ref that operation (optionally, but > in practice almost always) gets a precision input that is ultimately > determined by get_*_result of the appropriate traits. I don't >

RE: Cilk Library

2013-10-16 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
Hello Jeff, Please see my comments below: Thanks, Balaji V. Iyer. > -Original Message- > From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 4:14 PM > To: Iyer, Balaji V; gcc@gcc.gnu.org > Cc: Aldy Hernandez (al...@redhat.com); r...@redhat.com; Jason M

Re: function attributes

2013-10-16 Thread Nagaraju Mekala
Hi Umesh/Ian, I followed the steps and it has generated the required branch instruction. Thankyou so much for the links and steps. On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Umesh Kalappa wrote: > Here you go , > > a)define new field in the struct "CUMULATIVE_ARGS" says as int long_call; > > b)set

wide-int and int_traits::decompose getting a precision arg

2013-10-16 Thread Richard Biener
When investigating the code-bloat / slowness of wide-ints I noticed that when creating a wide_int_ref that operation (optionally, but in practice almost always) gets a precision input that is ultimately determined by get_*_result of the appropriate traits. I don't see code dealing with precision

Re: Compilation flags in libgfortran

2013-10-16 Thread Igor Zamyatin
Yeah, this is my point exactly. Atom case seems just triggered that fact. On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: > On 16/10/13 10:37, pins...@gmail.com wrote: >>> >>> On Oct 15, 2013, at 6:58 AM, Igor Zamyatin wrote: >>> Hi All! >>> >>> Is there any particular reason that matmul

GCC 4.8.3 Status Report (2013-10-16)

2013-10-16 Thread Jakub Jelinek
Status == GCC 4.8.2 has been released, the branch is again open for regression bugfixes and documentation fixes. GCC 4.8.3 could be tentatively released in March next year. Quality Data Priority # Change from Last Report --- ---

Re: function attributes

2013-10-16 Thread Umesh Kalappa
Here you go , a)define new field in the struct "CUMULATIVE_ARGS" says as int long_call; b)set the field long_call to known vlaue@ init_cumulative_args() . c)In the TARGET_FUNCTION_ARG hook The last time this MACRO is called, it is called with MODE == VOIDmode, and its result is

GCC 4.8.2 Released

2013-10-16 Thread Jakub Jelinek
The GNU Compiler Collection version 4.8.2 has been released. GCC 4.8.2 is the second bug-fix release containing important fixes for regressions and serious bugs in GCC 4.8.1 with over 70 bugs fixed since the previous release. This release is available from the FTP servers listed at: http://www

Re: Compilation flags in libgfortran

2013-10-16 Thread Kyrill Tkachov
On 16/10/13 10:37, pins...@gmail.com wrote: On Oct 15, 2013, at 6:58 AM, Igor Zamyatin wrote: Hi All! Is there any particular reason that matmul* modules from libgfortran are compiled with -O2 -ftree-vectorize? I see some regressions on Atom processor after r202980 (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-c

Re: Compilation flags in libgfortran

2013-10-16 Thread pinskia
> On Oct 15, 2013, at 6:58 AM, Igor Zamyatin wrote: > > Hi All! > > Is there any particular reason that matmul* modules from libgfortran > are compiled with -O2 -ftree-vectorize? > > I see some regressions on Atom processor after r202980 > (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2013-09/msg00846.html)

Re: Compilation flags in libgfortran

2013-10-16 Thread Igor Zamyatin
Thanks a lot for the explanation! I can take care of the benchmarking but only on Intel hardware... Do you think that possble changes according those results would be acceptable? Thanks, Igor On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 11:46 PM, Janne Blomqvist wrote: > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Igor Zamyat

Re: function attributes

2013-10-16 Thread Nagaraju Mekala
Yes.. I still had no luck. Do you have any thoughts on this?? On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Umesh Kalappa wrote: > You still stuck with this issue ??? > > ~Umesh > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Nagaraju Mekala >> wrote: >>> H

Re: function attributes

2013-10-16 Thread Umesh Kalappa
You still stuck with this issue ??? ~Umesh On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Nagaraju Mekala > wrote: >> Hi Ian, >> >> Thanks for the reply. >> >> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: >>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at

Re: Cilk Library

2013-10-16 Thread Richard Biener
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:14 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > On 10/09/13 12:32, Iyer, Balaji V wrote: >> >> Dear Jeff and the rest of Steering committee members, >> Thank you very much for approving the license terms of the Cilk >> Library. I couldn't attach the zipped copy of the patch due to its si