Quoting Jakub Jelinek :
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 10:45:46AM -0400, David Taylor wrote:
There are problems when using current STABS debug format for 64 bit
targets.
Why are you considering extending STABS at this point?
STABS support might very well be dropped altogether from GCC 4.9 or the nex
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 10:45:46AM -0400, David Taylor wrote:
> There are problems when using current STABS debug format for 64 bit
> targets.
Why are you considering extending STABS at this point?
STABS support might very well be dropped altogether from GCC 4.9 or the next
release, people just sh
There are problems when using current STABS debug format for 64 bit
targets.
A STABS entry is 12 bytes:
. e_strx (4 bytes)
. e_type (1 byte)
. e_other (1 byte)
. e_desc (2 bytes)
. e_value (4 bytes)
Unless you have an awfully lot of debug information, 4 bytes for a
string tab
Hi Terry,
Thank you very much. It was this macro that I had managed to miss:
> #ifndef MULTILIB_DEFAULTS
> #define MULTILIB_DEFAULTS \
> - { "marm", "mlittle-endian", "mfloat-abi=soft",
> "mno-thumb-interwork", "fno-leading-underscore" }
> + { "mthumb", "mlittle-endian", "mfloat-abi=soft",
>
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 3:03 AM, Gene Smith wrote:
> Could the -Og patches for 4.8 be back-ported to 4.7.3? Or is there important
> 4.8 dependencies that would make this not practicable?
>
> The patches to add -Og shown on gcc.patches list don't look extremely
> extensive.
>
> This would be for pe
