Re: -Og changes on 4.7.3?

2013-05-12 Thread Chung-Ju Wu
2013/5/13 Basile Starynkevitch : >> >> This would be for personal use and not necessarily proposed for >> general release. > > For personal use it is so much simpler to just build GCC 4.8 and use it. > No good reason to stick to a patched GCC 4.7 > > Cheers. > -- I guess Gene was concerning about

Re: -Og changes on 4.7.3?

2013-05-12 Thread Basile Starynkevitch
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 09:03:34PM -0400, Gene Smith wrote: > Could the -Og patches for 4.8 be back-ported to 4.7.3? Or is there > important 4.8 dependencies that would make this not practicable? I have no idea about the hypothetical future GCC 4.7.4, but I guess that the general policy would be

-Og changes on 4.7.3?

2013-05-12 Thread Gene Smith
Could the -Og patches for 4.8 be back-ported to 4.7.3? Or is there important 4.8 dependencies that would make this not practicable? The patches to add -Og shown on gcc.patches list don't look extremely extensive. This would be for personal use and not necessarily proposed for general release

[wwwdocs] PATCH for Re: 4.8 status on front page

2013-05-12 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Fri, 10 May 2013, Kenny Simpson wrote: > On http://gcc.gnu.org, the 4.8 status is still pointing to the original > release note from 4.8.0. > > Shouldn't it be updated to the status report on 2013-05-07 ? > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2013-05/msg00074.html Yes, you're right. Fixed thusly. Tha

gcc-4.9-20130512 is now available

2013-05-12 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-4.9-20130512 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.9-20130512/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.9 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk

Re: Calculating cosinus/sinus

2013-05-12 Thread Tim Prince
On 5/12/2013 9:53 AM, Ondřej Bílka wrote: On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 02:14:31PM +0200, David Brown wrote: On 11/05/13 17:20, jacob navia wrote: Le 11/05/13 16:01, Ondřej Bílka a écrit : As 1) only way is measure that. Compile following an we will see who is rigth. cat " #include int main(){ in

Re: Calculating cosinus/sinus

2013-05-12 Thread Ondřej Bílka
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 02:14:31PM +0200, David Brown wrote: > On 11/05/13 17:20, jacob navia wrote: > >Le 11/05/13 16:01, Ondřej Bílka a écrit : > >>As 1) only way is measure that. Compile following an we will see who is > >>rigth. > >> > >>cat " > >>#include > >> > >>int main(){ int i; > >> do

Re: Calculating cosinus/sinus

2013-05-12 Thread David Brown
On 11/05/13 17:20, jacob navia wrote: Le 11/05/13 16:01, Ondřej Bílka a écrit : As 1) only way is measure that. Compile following an we will see who is rigth. cat " #include int main(){ int i; double x=0; double ret=0; double f; for(i=0;i<1000;i++){ ret+=sin(x); x+

Re: Buzilla SVN commit messages

2013-05-12 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 12 May 2013 11:38, Oleg Endo wrote: > Hi, > > I've noticed that for some reason SVN commit messages stopped showing up > in Bugzilla PRs a while ago (before the Bugzilla 4.4 update). It was the sourceware.org hardware upgrade. The svn commit hook that used to email bugzilla wasn't migrated ove

Buzilla SVN commit messages

2013-05-12 Thread Oleg Endo
Hi, I've noticed that for some reason SVN commit messages stopped showing up in Bugzilla PRs a while ago (before the Bugzilla 4.4 update). What I usually put into the commit message goes like ... PR target/57108 * gcc.target/sh/pr57108.c: Move this test case to ... * gcc.

Re: OpenACC support in 4.9

2013-05-12 Thread Richard Biener
Dinar Temirbulatov wrote: >Another interesting use-case for OpenACC and OpenMP is mixing both >standard >annotations for the same loop: > // Compute matrix multiplication. >#pragma omp parallel for default(none) shared(A,B,C,size) >#pragma acc kernels pcopyin(A[0:size][0:size],B[0:size][0:size])