Greetings from South Korea
I have a proposition for you to the tune of Fifty Million EUR, if interested,
kindly reply for specifics
Regards,
Shin Eon-seong
Snapshot gcc-4.9-20130428 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.9-20130428/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.9 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk
"Bin.Cheng" wrote:
>I suspect codes in prepare_decl_rtl:
>
>case VAR_DECL:
>case PARM_DECL:
>case RESULT_DECL:
> *ws = 0;
> obj = *expr_p;
>
> if (DECL_RTL_SET_P (obj))
>break;
>
> if (DECL_MODE (obj) == BLKmode)
>x = produce_memory_decl_rtl (obj, regno);
>
I suspect codes in prepare_decl_rtl:
case VAR_DECL:
case PARM_DECL:
case RESULT_DECL:
*ws = 0;
obj = *expr_p;
if (DECL_RTL_SET_P (obj))
break;
if (DECL_MODE (obj) == BLKmode)
x = produce_memory_decl_rtl (obj, regno);
else
x = gen_raw_REG (DEC
Hi,
Currently tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c doesn't calculate addr_expr's cost,
while uses target_spill_cost instead, as in function
force_expr_to_var_cost. When I experimented with ivopts by calling
computation_cost to calculate cost of ADDR_EXPR, I encountered assert
failure in expand_expr_addr_expr_1,