The Linux binutils 2.23.52.0.2 is released

2013-04-26 Thread H.J. Lu
This is the beta release of binutils 2.23.52.0.2 for Linux, which is based on binutils 2013 0423 in CVS on sourceware.org plus various changes. It is purely for Linux. All relevant patches in patches have been applied to the source tree. You can take a look at patches/README to see what have been

Wierd manual link and resulting dead link

2013-04-26 Thread James Cloos
The What's New in 4.8 document links to the X86 Built-in Functions section of the online manual, but its link is dead. The working link is: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/X86-Built_002din-Functions.html#X86-Built_002din-Functions Note the >_002d< rather than a >-<. Presumably a side effec

Re: [Testsuite] tree-ssa failures for targets with non 32 bit int size

2013-04-26 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Fri, 26 Apr 2013, Richard Biener wrote: > The test scanning for * 4 would not be fixed with int32plus indeed (if > int is larger than 32bits). Using int32_t would be better than > SImode as SImode is not guaranteed to be 32bits either. SImode should (if it exists) always be four times QImode,

Re: gcc home page

2013-04-26 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 26 April 2013 13:09, Jurgis Upenieks wrote: > Hi, > > I think that I have found a bug in gcc home page gcc-4.7 changes. > In C++ paragraph about explicit override control. > In example code, is it really struct, not class? Yes, that's valid C++, the example is fine.

gcc home page

2013-04-26 Thread Jurgis Upenieks
Hi, I think that I have found a bug in gcc home page gcc-4.7 changes. In C++ paragraph about explicit override control. In example code, is it really struct, not class? BR, Jurgis

Re: [Testsuite] tree-ssa failures for targets with non 32 bit int size

2013-04-26 Thread Richard Biener
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote: > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:03:43AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Mike Stump wrote: >> > On Apr 25, 2013, at 7:44 AM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj >> > wrote: >> >> What is right way to fix these? I sa

GSoC openMP task scheduling Advice

2013-04-26 Thread guray.ozen
Hi, I'm MSc High-Performance Computing student at Polytechnic University of Catalonia(BarcelonaTech). I'm interesting openmp task scheduling optimization or openmp 3.1 facility taskyield. @For Task scheduling I'm using mercurium compiler already at my university because the compiler was developed

Re: [Testsuite] tree-ssa failures for targets with non 32 bit int size

2013-04-26 Thread Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:03:43AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Mike Stump wrote: > > On Apr 25, 2013, at 7:44 AM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj > > wrote: > >> What is right way to fix these? I saw one testcase that did > >> > >> typedef int int32_t __attribute__ ((_

Re: How do I modify SSA and copy basic blocks?

2013-04-26 Thread Richard Biener
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Steve Ellcey wrote: > On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 09:53 +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > >> We have gimple_duplicate_sese_region for this. It may be not perfect though. >> Eventually it should be changed to handle SEME regions as well and all >> loop copying / versioning

Re: [Testsuite] tree-ssa failures for targets with non 32 bit int size

2013-04-26 Thread Richard Biener
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Mike Stump wrote: > On Apr 25, 2013, at 7:44 AM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj > wrote: >> What is right way to fix these? I saw one testcase that did >> >> typedef int int32_t __attribute__ ((__mode__ (__SI__))); >> >> Is this the right way to go? > > I like this. Pre