Re: [RFC] Unsolicited usage of VFP registers for Cortex-M4F

2012-10-09 Thread Ilija Kocho
On 10.10.2012 06:05, Joey Ye wrote: > >> -Original Message- >> From: Ilija Kocho [mailto:ili...@siva.com.mk] >> Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 21:08 >> To: Joey Ye >> Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Terry Guo >> Subject: Re: [RFC] Unsolicited usage of VFP registers for Cortex-M4F >> >> Hi Joey >> >>

RE: [RFC] Unsolicited usage of VFP registers for Cortex-M4F

2012-10-09 Thread Joey Ye
> -Original Message- > From: Ilija Kocho [mailto:ili...@siva.com.mk] > Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 21:08 > To: Joey Ye > Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Terry Guo > Subject: Re: [RFC] Unsolicited usage of VFP registers for Cortex-M4F > > Hi Joey > > Thank you for explanations. Now I have some

Re: Cannot modify jumps after sched2

2012-10-09 Thread Georg-Johann Lay
Paulo Matos schrieb: Hi, Is there any good way to define TARGET_CANNOT_MODIFY_JUMPS_P such that jumps are not modified after sched2? Or in other words, is there a way to recognize if sched2 has already been ran (sched2_completed, maybe)? Such flags would be really helpful, but unfortunately t

unsigned integers and the calculation of PI

2012-10-09 Thread Mischa Baars
Hi All, I'm trying to verify the 'fldpi' instruction on the Intel Processor. Hope you would like to have a look at the following piece of example code? Best Regards, Mischa. http://www.cyberfiber.org/sites/default/files/2012020314%20-%20algorithms%20on%20the%20intel%20processor%20-%20unsigned

Re: Proposing switch -fsmart-pointers

2012-10-09 Thread Andrew Haley
On 10/09/2012 12:31 AM, Peter wrote: > > On Oct 8, 2012, at 5:17 PM, Andrew Haley wrote: > >> On 10/06/2012 11:59 AM, _ wrote: >>> Not that I think that STL/Boost are not great solutions for many >>> problems out there. >>> But the fact is that there is and always will be c/c++ code that can't >

Re: [RFC] Unsolicited usage of VFP registers for Cortex-M4F

2012-10-09 Thread Ilija Kocho
Hi Joey Thank you for explanations. Now I have some comments and additional questions. Since now it will be a discussion rather than looking for help, I am re-routing the discussion to GCC mailing list. For those looking for the complete history, here is the context: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help

Re: Cannot modify jumps after sched2

2012-10-09 Thread Joern Rennecke
Quoting Steven Bosscher : Paul Matos wrote (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-10/msg00123.html): Is there any good way to define TARGET_CANNOT_MODIFY_JUMPS_P such that jumps are not modified after sched2? No, there isn't. Well, you could add a target-specific pass after sched2 with the sole

Cannot modify jumps after sched2

2012-10-09 Thread Paulo Matos
Hi, Is there any good way to define TARGET_CANNOT_MODIFY_JUMPS_P such that jumps are not modified after sched2? Or in other words, is there a way to recognize if sched2 has already been ran (sched2_completed, maybe)? Cheers, Paulo Matos

Re: DECL_STRUCT_FUNCTION(cgraphnode->decl) == NULL when attempting Link-Time Optimization in plugin

2012-10-09 Thread Richard Guenther
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 11:29 PM, David Malcolm wrote: > On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 18:21 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 5:17 PM, David Malcolm wrote: >> > I'm working on a static analysis extension to GCC via my >> > gcc-python-plugin [1] >> > >> > The analysis is interproced

Re: Proposing switch -fsmart-pointers

2012-10-09 Thread Ladislav Nevery
Ahh ... sorry for that incomplete mail. I lost my right hand in paragliding accident 2 months ago. And writing mail with one hand on tablet is kinda weird. Again sorry .;( Here is the complete version. On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Andrew Haley wrote: > On 10/06/2012 11:59 AM, _ wrote: >> Not t

Re: Proposing switch -fsmart-pointers

2012-10-09 Thread Peter
On Oct 8, 2012, at 5:17 PM, Andrew Haley wrote: > On 10/06/2012 11:59 AM, _ wrote: >> Not that I think that STL/Boost are not great solutions for many >> problems out there. >> But the fact is that there is and always will be c/c++ code that can't >> and will not use it. > > But surely the set