Snapshot gcc-4.8-20121007 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.8-20121007/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.8 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk
On Oct 7, 2012 1:05 AM, "_" wrote:
>
> And as optional switch it's harmless to rest of gcc.
This is not true.
Every option adds a maintenance burden. It must be tested and its
interaction with other features must be considered, making it harder
to make future changes if they overlap or interfere
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:15 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
>
>> Why do you need to change varasm.c at all? The hunks seem to be
>> completely separate of the attribute.
>
> Because static constructors have fields in the original order, not the
> reversed order. Otherwise code like this is miscompiled:
On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 02:47:59AM +0200, _ wrote:
> You will probably kill me for this. But no such patch yet exists.
> I am kinda trying findout wheter there is interest in such experiment
> and find some help since to me alone it would take ages.
I would suggest you to experiment your idea thru
