Re: gfortran error: Statement order error: declaration after DATA

2012-09-11 Thread Tobias Burnus
David N. Bradley wrote: I am trying to compile the cactuscode package and can not get past the error : Statement order error: declaration after DATA Somehow the whole is very odd. a) I tried your program with gfortran 4.1 to 4.8, g95 and g77 - and none of them prints this error - all comp

Re: variable tracking vs. delay slots question

2012-09-11 Thread Jeff Law
On 09/11/2012 04:33 PM, Steve Ellcey wrote: In some configuration files there is comment that says that the variable tracking pass should be run after all optimizations which change the order of instructions and that it requires a valid control flow graph to work. But my understanding of the del

Re: contrib/config-list.mk

2012-09-11 Thread Joern Rennecke
Quoting Ian Lance Taylor : On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Lawrence Crowl wrote: The contrib/config-list.mk tool appears to be suffering from bitrot. The make failures for a limited subset of configurations consisted exclusively of: cc1: warnings being treated as errors ../../../../gcc/fixin

gfortran error: Statement order error: declaration after DATA

2012-09-11 Thread David N. Bradley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I am trying to compile the cactuscode package and can not get past the error : Statement order error: declaration after DATA can you point me in the direction of a fix. I included offending file as an attachment. Dave kb9qhd Amateur Radio Serv

Re: contrib/config-list.mk

2012-09-11 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Lawrence Crowl wrote: > The contrib/config-list.mk tool appears to be suffering from bitrot. > The make failures for a limited subset of configurations consisted > exclusively of: > > cc1: warnings being treated as errors > ../../../../gcc/fixincludes/server.c: In

variable tracking vs. delay slots question

2012-09-11 Thread Steve Ellcey
I have a question about the the variable tracking and the delay slot passes. In some configuration files there is comment that says that the variable tracking pass should be run after all optimizations which change the order of instructions and that it requires a valid control flow graph to work.

contrib/config-list.mk

2012-09-11 Thread Lawrence Crowl
The contrib/config-list.mk tool appears to be suffering from bitrot. The make failures for a limited subset of configurations consisted exclusively of: cc1: warnings being treated as errors ../../../../gcc/fixincludes/server.c: In function 'server_setup': ../../../../gcc/fixincludes/server.c:195:

Re: Cgraph Modification Plan

2012-09-11 Thread Lawrence Crowl
We do not yet seem to have consensus on a long term plan. Would it be reasonable to start on short term prepatory work? In particular, I was think we could do Add converters and testers. Change callers to use those. and maybe Change callers to use type-safe parameters. Where those mea

Re: GCC's Decimal Floating Point extension problem

2012-09-11 Thread H.J. Lu
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Mohamed Abou Samra wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm trying to write a small program to check the decimal floating point gcc > extension but I encountered some problems > > The program just converts a _Decimal64 number to double to print it and I > used the function (do

GCC's Decimal Floating Point extension problem

2012-09-11 Thread Mohamed Abou Samra
 Hi All, I'm trying to write a small program to check the decimal floating point gcc extension but I encountered some problems The program just converts a _Decimal64 number to double to print it and I used the function (double __bid_truncdddf (_Decimal64 a) as the gnu online docs show) #includ

Re: C++'ization of cp/parser.c/h, limited C++ parsing support for gengtype, Remove dependency of cp/cp-lang.c on cp/parser.h

2012-09-11 Thread Michael Matz
Hi, On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > > You could also do this with an explicit pointer-to-context-struct > > parameter that's passed around (and that version of the patch I > > posted), but the class-based approached seems nicer to me. > > Are we talking about encapsulation or "l

Re: Libtool update for gcc-4.8 (slim-lto bootstrap)?

2012-09-11 Thread Jan Hubicka
> Is there any interest in updating the in-tree libtool to something > newer? This update would allow to use a -fno-fat-lto-objects > lto-bootstrap target, that should speed up the (lto) build time. > > If there is interest, when would be the best date for such an update? There is definitely an i

Libtool update for gcc-4.8 (slim-lto bootstrap)?

2012-09-11 Thread Markus Trippelsdorf
Is there any interest in updating the in-tree libtool to something newer? This update would allow to use a -fno-fat-lto-objects lto-bootstrap target, that should speed up the (lto) build time. If there is interest, when would be the best date for such an update? Thanks. -- Markus

Re: gcc-c-api

2012-09-11 Thread Richard Guenther
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 3:10 AM, David Malcolm wrote: > On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 17:20 +0200, Michael Matz wrote: >> Hi David, >> >> On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, David Malcolm wrote: >> >> > Is it possible for you to post your work-in-progress code somewhere? >> >> Attached. > > Many thanks for posting this!

Re: shrink-wrap leads to ICE at dwarf2cfi.c

2012-09-11 Thread Zhenqiang Chen
On 11 September 2012 03:37, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 09/10/2012 01:41 AM, Zhenqiang Chen wrote: >> In function maybe_record_trace_start, there is a check: >> >> /* We ought to have the same state incoming to a given trace no >> matter how we arrive at the trace. Anything else