Thanks for your response!
On 06/19/2012 08:40 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Daniel Santos wrote:
>> So before filing any feature request bugs, I figured I should bring my
>> discussion here first, as I believe some enhancements to gcc can better
>> enable this typ
Hi,
I have developed a small profiler which uses AMD's IBS (Instruction
Based Samling) to profile a program. With the help of it, I am able to
generate quite detailed information about the program like how many
times there is a branch miss for each branch or which instructions are
causing a lot of
Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Walter Landry wrote:
>> Hello Everyone,
>>
>> I thought you might be interested in some C++ expression template
>> benchmarks I have done.
>>
>> http://www.wlandry.net/Projects/FTensor#Benchmarks
>>
>> I found that GCC optimized the exp
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 20:59 +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jun 2012, Steve Ellcey wrote:
>
> > I am building a multilib mips compiler using '--with-synci' on the
> > configure line. This means that gcc will pass the '-msynci' option
> > to cc1 by default. The problem occurs when on
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> I am building a multilib mips compiler using '--with-synci' on the
> configure line. This means that gcc will pass the '-msynci' option
> to cc1 by default. The problem occurs when one of my multilib
> targets (like -mips32) does not support synci. T
"Steve Ellcey " writes:
> I am building a multilib mips compiler using '--with-synci' on the
> configure line. This means that gcc will pass the '-msynci' option
> to cc1 by default. The problem occurs when one of my multilib
> targets (like -mips32) does not support synci. This means that
>
On 06/18/2012 10:51 PM, Franz Fehringer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am investigating the possibilities of using decimal floating point
> arithmetic with gcc (on Linux / x86_64 to be explicit).
I'm a little rusty on this and my information might be out of date, but
this should be a good start. If I say so
On 6/14/2012 5:41 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
I would like to point out that in libjava/sysdep/*/lockThe syncs.h many
targets still implement atomics in assembly. These utility functions
can be implemented with new atomic builtins, avoiding quite some
compexity.
This requires changes to the testsuite
I am trying to fix a multilib build problem and am hoping a build expert
can help me figure out a fix/workaround to my problem.
I am building a multilib mips compiler using '--with-synci' on the
configure line. This means that gcc will pass the '-msynci' option
to cc1 by default. The problem o
Terry Guo writes:
> But when check .debug_info section of .out file, I can still see entry
> for this deadstripped function:
I have two things to say about this message.
First, this message is not appropriate for the mailing list
gcc@gcc.gnu.org, which is for discussion related to the developme
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Daniel Santos wrote:
> Yes, my topic sounds crazy huh? But you guys made it possible when you
> started optimizing out constant function pointers. (Thank you!!) This
> didn't mature to "full power" until 4.6.? (works in 4.6.2, not sure
> about earlier 4.6). Now t
Thats very interesting, thanks for sharing.
mike
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Daniel Santos wrote:
> Yes, my topic sounds crazy huh? But you guys made it possible when you
> started optimizing out constant function pointers. (Thank you!!) This
> didn't mature to "full power" until 4.6.? (wor
Hi,
I’m a representative of the NGO called “Translation for Education”. Our
organization makes non-commercial translations from various foreign
languages for those who don’t know English, but are curious to find out new
things that appear in the English-speaking Internet. Usually I (and oth
13 matches
Mail list logo
