Hi,
I have following code which will be built with options
"-ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -Wl,--gc-sections
-Wl,-Map=test.map":
#include
static int unusedint=5;
static int usedint=1;
int unused(void) {
return 1;
}
int foo(void) {
return usedint;
}
int main(void) {
if (fo
Terry writes:
> Posting here rather than gcc.help since I consider this behaviour to
> be a bug.
The right place is still gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org. That is the mailing list
for all discussions about using GCC, as opposed to discussions about how
to change GCC.
> When I step through the function "r
Thank you for your response!
On 2012-06-12, at 8:03 AM, Vincent Rivière wrote:
> On 11/06/2012 21:20, t-rexky wrote:
>>> #include
>>> #include
>>>
>>> int main() {
>>> printf("%lf\n", acos(0.5));
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>
> First, note that acos(0.5) is a "double" expression so its format should
> Should I do something similar for PA as well?
Right. Doing similar fix for PA solved the issue. The modifications attached
below. Please review the same. Without this modification PA HP-UX build will
continue to fail (even in trunk). So request one of you to review it as
soon as possible.
-
Snapshot gcc-4.8-20120617 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.8-20120617/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.8 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk
Posting here rather than gcc.help since I consider this behaviour to be
a bug.
Here is my demo program to illustrate the buggy behavior:
#include
#include
#include
#define PATH_SEP '/'
static unsigned char *replace_HOME(
unsigned char*filespec)
{
unsigned chartmpspec[300],
On 2012-06-15 15:05, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> This causes the libatomic build to fail because it is compiled
> with -Werror which is added in the configure script. None of the
> other libraries seem to be built with -Werror. Can we take this out?
> Or should it be replaced by AC_PROG_CPP_WERROR? I
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Odne Hellebø wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Just wanted to report that these links on your page are broken:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.7.1/libstdc++/manual/
> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.7.1/libstdc++/api/
>
> With their pdf, xml and html tarball links.
>
Hello,
Just wanted to report that these links on your page are broken:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.7.1/libstdc++/manual/
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.7.1/libstdc++/api/
With their pdf, xml and html tarball links.
I noticed because I wanted to read them :D
Regards,
Odne Hellebø
