Richard Henderson schrieb:
On 01/21/2012 01:48 AM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
FRACTIONAL_INT_MODE (PSI, 24, 3);
Unrelated to everything else, I'm not sure you want a *fractional* mode.
You're using all bits of the 3 bytes of storage. Fractional modes are
those where there are unused bits of the
On 01/21/2012 01:48 AM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> FRACTIONAL_INT_MODE (PSI, 24, 3);
Unrelated to everything else, I'm not sure you want a *fractional* mode.
You're using all bits of the 3 bytes of storage. Fractional modes are
those where there are unused bits of the in-memory representation. E.
Richard Guenther writes:
> I'd say open a missed optimization bug with the testcase and go ahead
> with both patches.
OK, I committed the patches yesterday and I've just opened PR 52000
for the missed optimisation.
Richard
On 25.01.2012 16:14, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On 25.01.2012 15:49, Richard Guenther wrote:
You can change the linker used by adjusting your path or giving an
appropriate -B option to the gcc driver.
Richard.
Yes, but part of the thread
Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2012, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>
>> You mean that thread?
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg00064.html
>> and
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg00079.html
>
> Yes, the whole thread (with particular reference to my comments about w
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> You mean that thread?
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg00064.html
> and
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg00079.html
Yes, the whole thread (with particular reference to my comments about what
should be kept target-dependen
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> On 25.01.2012 15:49, Richard Guenther wrote:
>>
>>
>> You can change the linker used by adjusting your path or giving an
>> appropriate -B option to the gcc driver.
>>
>> Richard.
>>
> Yes, but part of the thread was precisely to discuss al
On 25.01.2012 15:49, Richard Guenther wrote:
You can change the linker used by adjusting your path or giving an
appropriate -B option to the gcc driver.
Richard.
Yes, but part of the thread was precisely to discuss alternatives, more
end-user friendly (for those won't know the full path to a
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In a one year old thread, there was a discussion about a patch adding
> -fuse-ld=gold and -fuse-ld=bfd options to GCC.
>
> It seems the GCC part of the patch was never actually committed, as there
> were some problems with LTO:
>
Hello,
In a one year old thread, there was a discussion about a patch adding
-fuse-ld=gold and -fuse-ld=bfd options to GCC.
It seems the GCC part of the patch was never actually committed, as there were
some problems with LTO:
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2011-01/msg00287.html
Unfortunat
Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>
>> Hi.
>>
>> avr-gcc implements a 24-bit scalar integer types __int24 and __uint24 in
>> avr.c:TARGET_INIT_BUILTINS like so:
>>
>> tree int24_type = make_signed_type (GET_MODE_BITSIZE (PSImode));
>> tree uint24_type = mak
11 matches
Mail list logo