On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Amker.Cheng wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Richard Guenther
> wrote:
>>
>> No, I think the check is superfluous and should be removed. I also wonder
>> why we exempt BUILT_IN_FREE here ... can you dig in SVN history a bit?
>> For both things?
Hi Rich
On 1/15/2012 7:21 PM, Mr Anthony Arnold wrote:
I would like to make a change to the GNAT.SHA1 library. I hope this
is the right mailing list.
Currently, this library only supports the return of a String digest
of the SHA1 sum. I would like to be able to access the H member of
the Context so that
I would like to make a change to the GNAT.SHA1 library. I hope this is the
right mailing list.
Currently, this library only supports the return of a String digest of the SHA1
sum. I would like to be able to access the H member of the Context so that I
can work with the 5x32-bit integers that ma
In the port I'm working on I have used the newer CC tracking technique
(i.e. not cc0). I have followed the directions at the top of
compare-elim.c and have the following pattern for addhi3
(define_insn "addhi3"
[
(set (match_operand:WORD 0 "register_operand" "=r,r,r")
(plu
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, NetGull Administrator wrote:
> I've just set up a new GCC mirror. Information is as follows:
>
> URL: http://www.netgull.com/gcc/
> Frequency:once a day
> Location:San Jose, California, United States, North America
> Contact: ad...@netgull.com
>
> Please, add
Hi,
I noticed that when you generate dwarf for an inlined function it often
comes with duplicate range lists for both the DW_TAG_inlined_subroutine
and the child DW_TAG_lexical_block DIE. For example:
static int k;
static int foo (int i)
{
int j = i + 42;
return k + (j > 14 ? j : i);
}
int
Hello,
I am trying to understand comp_type_attributes, which checks whether
attributes are compatible. From what I understand, on many platforms, that
function can only ever return 1. Indeed, it does some checks to know
whether it can answer 1, and if not it forwards to the target, which by
d
