extraordinary writes:
> I want to change the search path of GCC for its header files, so for all
> future references GCC should look only for this path not the others.
Are you asking as a GCC user or a GCC developer? The mailing list
gcc@gcc.gnu.org is for people who work on GCC itself. For th
Hi Guys,
I want to change the search path of GCC for its header files, so for all
future references GCC should look only for this path not the others.
Please excuse my English.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/How-to-change-the-search-path-for-header-files-tp32983433p329
Snapshot gcc-4.5-20111215 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.5-20111215/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.5 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On 12/15/2011 03:07 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
on x86_64-apple-darwin11. While Linux/ia32 and Linux/x86-64 don't
seem to be exhibiting those failures any more, I don't see any
analysis of the cause of the previous failures or fixes proposed to
address these. Did the problem just go latent on those t
nix.exp as board description file for
target.
Using /sw/share/dejagnu/config/unix.exp as generic interface file for target.
Using
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1/gcc-4.7-20111215/libitm/testsuite/config/default.exp
as tool-and-target-specific interface file.
Running
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc47-4.
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Joe Buck wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 07:35:17PM -0700, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
>>> C++11 is essentially binary incompatible with C++98.
>>
>> Only partially. The layout for user-defined classes is t
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 10:51 -0500, Patrick Marlier wrote:
> Here a list of known bugs for trans-mem. I have tried to sort it by
> priority (highest first).
Thanks for this list!
Items that I would add:
* Publication safety could potentially be violated. We suspect this can
happen when loads ar
Hi Guys!
Transactional Memory will be released in 4.7 so even if it is
experimental, I hope it will come with only few bugs in it. Users could
be enthusiastic to test it so it could be great to offer them a great
experience.
Here a list of known bugs for trans-mem. I have tried to sort it by
This message is primarily a suggestion -- while the GNU compilers
already do a strong job on threading via OpenMP, I would very much like
to see upcoming GNU compilers support the new OpenACC directives for
accelerator-based computing (e.g. GPUs and the upcoming MICs).
Thanks for everything yo
Merge from trunk at revision 182206.
This merge is still susceptible to PR 51554, but it does not
affect many builds. I'll just pick up Jason's fix in the next
merge.
Tested on x86_64.
Diego.
Hi,
I'd like to know if there a way to express 'add' and 'compare' insn so that the
combiner transform it in and 'add_and_compare' insn.
I watch arm backend and it seems possible when I look at 'addsi3', 'cbranchsi4'
and '*addsi3_compare0'.
In my backend I have written the following insn/expan
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Amker.Cheng wrote:
> HI,
> I encountered a case with below codes:
>
> int data_0;
> int motion_test1(int data, int v)
> {
> int i;
> int t, u;
> int x;
>
> if (data)
> i = data_0 + x;
> else {
> v = 2;
>
On Wed, 7 Dec 2011, Diego Novillo wrote:
> Thanks. I fixed this yesterday. Reload?
Aren't we trying to get rid of that? ;-)
SCNR,
Gerald
Forgot the command line:
arm-none-eabi-gcc -O2 -mthumb -mcpu=cortex-m3 -S test.c -o test.S
-fdump-tree-all
gcc is comfigured as arm-non-eabi, but I think it's independent of target.
--
Best Regards.
HI,
I encountered a case with below codes:
int data_0;
int motion_test1(int data, int v)
{
int i;
int t, u;
int x;
if (data)
i = data_0 + x;
else {
v = 2;
i = 5;
}
t = data_0 + x;
u = i;
15 matches
Mail list logo
