On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 21:17:47 -0700
Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> Basile Starynkevitch
> > I would like to add destroyable objects into Ggc (the GCC garbage
> > collector, see files gcc/ggc*.[ch]).
> >
> > The main motivation is to permit C++ objects to be garbage collected
> > (I discussed that briefl
"Iyer, Balaji V" writes:
> Is there a function (or a series of functions) in GCC using which I can
> convert a register number (either in RTX or int) to DWARF code?
Are you looking for DWARF_FRAME_REGNUM?
If not, what do you mean by DWARF code? Do you mean inside gcc, or in
code compile
te available from gcc.gnu.org
>
> The first release candidate for GCC 4.6.2 is available from
>
> ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.6.2-RC-20111019
>
> and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 180180.
>
> I have so far bootstrapped and tested the rele
Hi, all
I think this issue causes the gdb crash on XP.
You can see the thread: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2011-10/msg00056.html
My many friends and I can reproduce this crash issue, but no problem on Win7.
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 5:05 AM, Bob Breuer wrote:
> Kai Tietz wrote:
>> 2011/10/18 Bob
Basile Starynkevitch
> I would like to add destroyable objects into Ggc (the GCC garbage
> collector, see files gcc/ggc*.[ch]).
>
> The main motivation is to permit C++ objects to be garbage collected
> (I discussed that briefly in the Gcc meeting at Google in London):
> adding destroyable object
Hello Everyone,
Is there a function (or a series of functions) in GCC using which I can
convert a register number (either in RTX or int) to DWARF code?
Any help is greatly appreciated!
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
I'd like to create a new "fission" branch on the GIT mirror at
ssh://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git. This branch will host the changes that
Sterling and I will be making to support splitting the debug info into
separate files -- and, as a byproduct, fixing the pubnames and
pubtypes tables so they can be u
On 10/19/2011 02:05 PM, Bob Breuer wrote:
> Is it possible to force a
> stackframe by just adding a suitable attribute to either the setjmp
> function prototype, or the function which calls setjmp?
The only thing I can think of that'll be portable to a large number
of versions of GCC is
{
i
Kai Tietz wrote:
> 2011/10/18 Bob Breuer :
>> Kai Tietz wrote:
>>> 2011/10/17 Bob Breuer :
Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 10/17/2011 07:09 AM, Bob Breuer wrote:
>> Google finds a mention of longjmp failing with -fomit-frame-pointer:
>> http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2005-02/msg001
Szanując Państwa prywatność oraz mając na uwadze przepisy Ustawy o świadczeniu
usług drogą elektroniczną, zwracam się z zapytaniem o możliwość przesłania
oferty handlowej.
Jeżeli jesteście Państwo zainteresowani otrzymaniem oferty dotyczącej
profesjonalnej obsługi księgowej Państwa Firmy - pro
On 19 October 2011 08:42, Duncan Sands wrote:
> Hi Gabriel,
>
>>> I also agree with you that GCC architecture is messy, and that scares
>>> newscomer a lot.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, but the way we improve it isn't, in my opinion, adding more GC.
>> First we would like to remove complexity, and I do not think
-Original Message-
From: Gary Funck [mailto:g...@intrepid.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 5:00 PM
To: Jakub Jelinek
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Joseph S. Myers
Subject: Re: GCC 4.7.0 Status Report (2011-09-09)
On 09/09/11 09:09:30, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> [...] What is the status of lra
On 14/10/11 19:31, Ben Gamari wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 18:38:26 +0100, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>> On 14/10/11 17:40, Ben Gamari wrote:
>>> I was recently trying to test GCC's behavior in producing various types
>>> of ARM relocations. In particular, I was trying to produce an
>>> R_ARM_JUMP24
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 04:31:48PM +0300, Laurynas Biveinis wrote:
> In the end I believe that it is the patches that talk. Whatever
> patches are going to be submitted, reviewed and accepted, that is
> going to be GCC's future, be it memory management, or something els
I was beginning to work on
Basile -
2011/10/18 Basile Starynkevitch :
> Still, I find strange that while some very smart & nice GCC guys want to get
> rid of Ggc,
> no patch made into the trunk towards that goal (which I Basile dislike and
> don't share,
> so don't expect me Basile to work on this.).
Well, there is my RT
On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 00:45 -0500, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Chiheng Xu wrote:
>
> > I recommend people interested in automatic dynamic memory management
> > to read this book:
> > Garbage Collection: Algorithms For Automatic Dynamic Memory
> > Management(Richard
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 02:57:26PM +0200, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 10/19/2011 02:13 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> [...]
> >If all goes well, I'd like to release 4.6.2 in the middle of the next week.
>
> will there be another release candidate early next week?
If possible, not.
> Is there a chanc
Hello,
On 10/19/2011 02:13 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
[...]
If all goes well, I'd like to release 4.6.2 in the middle of the next week.
will there be another release candidate early next week?
Is there a chance that these ARM regressions get fixed in this release?
(A) http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi
GCC 4.6.2 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
The first release candidate for GCC 4.6.2 is available from
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.6.2-RC-20111019
and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 180180.
I have so far bootstrapped and tested the release
Hi Gabriel,
I also agree with you that GCC architecture is messy, and that scares newscomer
a lot.
Yes, but the way we improve it isn't, in my opinion, adding more GC.
First we would like to remove complexity, and I do not think we should
start by focusing on storage management until we get
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 06:08:15AM +0200, Jason Merrill wrote:
> I'll backport that hunk, thanks for catching this.
Great ! You're welcome Jason.
Yvan
21 matches
Mail list logo
