On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 6 August 2011 22:40, Christopher Huang-Leaver wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> This isn't really a compiler bug, but it's something which the manual
>> doesn't describe too well so I thought I would point this out.
>>
>> This page of the manual:
>>
On 6 August 2011 22:40, Christopher Huang-Leaver wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This isn't really a compiler bug, but it's something which the manual
> doesn't describe too well so I thought I would point this out.
>
> This page of the manual:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/cpp/Common-Predefined-Macros.html#
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Christopher Huang-Leaver
wrote:
> Output:
>
> small end first
> big end first
>
> gcc -v
> gcc version 4.4.5 (Gentoo 4.4.5 p1.2, pie-0.4.5)
>
I got the same result with g++-4.4 (4.4.6), g++-4.5 (4.5.3) on Debian
testing. But with g++-4.6, I got
small end first
on
Snapshot gcc-4.7-20110806 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.7-20110806/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.7 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk
Hello,
This isn't really a compiler bug, but it's something which the manual
doesn't describe too well so I thought I would point this out.
This page of the manual:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/cpp/Common-Predefined-Macros.html#Common-Predefined-Macros
says this:
"
You should use these macros f
On 08/06/2011 05:14 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
You left out the crucial hardware spec. How much memory
did you have 19 years ago compared to the system today?
My experience with g++ is that it will consume more memory
than gcc.
That might be true - I have never experienced memory shortage *buildi
Ping. AVX2 support depends on this patch.
Thanks.
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 5:49 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 4:44 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Joseph S. Myers
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 4 Aug 2011, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>
Here is the updated patch to get prop
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Basile Starynkevitch writes:
And I also believe that the minuscule patch I am proposing in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-06/msg00081.html
should work on your system too. Could you try it please?
That's not the point. The point is, if you patch, yo
On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 03:16:43PM +0200, Toon Moene wrote:
> On 08/06/2011 11:22 AM, Mikael Morin wrote:
>
> >WRT to bootstrap time, as usual: it's too long.
>
> Well, that all depends on your (time) frame of reference, of course. In
> the summer months leading up to Craig Burley asking for vo
On 08/04/2011 01:10 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> It's the sort of thing that gets done in threaded interpreters,
>> where you really need to keep a few pointers in registers and
>> the interpreter itself is a very long function. gcc has always
>> done a dreadful job of register allocation in s
On 08/06/2011 11:22 AM, Mikael Morin wrote:
WRT to bootstrap time, as usual: it's too long.
Well, that all depends on your (time) frame of reference, of course. In
the summer months leading up to Craig Burley asking for volunteers
testing g77 (the g77-alpha phase), i.e., during the summer o
On Saturday 06 August 2011 00:52:02 Thomas Koenig wrote:
> Hello world,
>
> I just noticed that C++ now appears to be built by default, even when
> only the C and fortran are specified.
Yes, but it doesn't make much difference in practice. The only difference I
saw is the debugging symbols includ
12 matches
Mail list logo
