> This is not the global constructor/destructor issue with names
> generated by collect2. But ELF or SVR4 is able to provide a unique
> name without resorting to random numbers.
Not clear if the name needs be unique at all if you have the right features,
see name-lookup.c:get_anonymous_namespace
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Jul 20, 2011, at 1:25 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> Interesting. I don't know why this doesn't happen on GNU/Linux.
>
> It doesn't happen as the symbols in question are local on linux. collect2
> runs nm on public symbols looking for symb
Mike Stump writes:
>> Presumably the fix will be to use -frandom-seed.
>
> But, the random seem was to ensure that things that should not collide,
> don't. If you use 0, then things that should not collide, eventually will
> and your world with then end. In the present code base, it is perfec
On 07/20/2011 04:34 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
So I changed my "lto" bootstrap script to do the following:
language=fortran
if [ $RANDOM -lt 16384 ]
then
language=ada
fi
...
../gcc/configure \
...
--enable-languages=c++,$language \
Still have to see if this will fit in the 2:20 hour gap between two
On Jul 20, 2011, at 1:25 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Interesting. I don't know why this doesn't happen on GNU/Linux.
It doesn't happen as the symbols in question are local on linux. collect2 runs
nm on public symbols looking for symbols of a particular form, it then builds
two lists, one for
David Edelsohn writes:
> I now can get through the build of the compiler, but stage2 and stage3
> libstdc++ and libsupc++ files have many comparison failures due to
> tree.c:get_file_function_name() introducing explicit randomness to
> produce different symbols for anonymous namespaces:
Interest
> That's clear, sorry for the confision. From where in the
> backend do you call register_pass?
I used TARGET_ASM_FILE_START()
DJ Delorie schrieb:
I just call register_pass() with a suitable struct.
Which hook did you use to add/move the pass?
I used register_pass().
That's clear, sorry for the confision. From where in the
backend do you call register_pass?
I now can get through the build of the compiler, but stage2 and stage3
libstdc++ and libsupc++ files have many comparison failures due to
tree.c:get_file_function_name() introducing explicit randomness to
produce different symbols for anonymous namespaces:
/* Otherwise, the name must be uniq
santosh tatoju writes:
> for gcc there are many directories in gcc/testsuite directory
>
> like gcc.dg, gcc.c-torture,gcc-misc-tests, gcc-target, and for
>
> g++ compiler g++.dg, g++-old.dg i just want to know what are all these for.
>
> i got info. for gcc related as gcc.c-torture for stressin
> > I just call register_pass() with a suitable struct.
>
> Which hook did you use to add/move the pass?
I used register_pass().
Hi!
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:41:37 -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> AIX needs libsupc++ for libstdc++ static linking.
>
> * Makefile.tpl (POSTSTAGE1_CONFIGURE_FLAGS): Add libsupc++ to
> link directories.
> * Makefile.in: Rebuild.
>
> Index: Makefile.tpl
> ===
David Edelsohn writes:
> AIX needs libsupc++ for libstdc++ static linking.
>
> * Makefile.tpl (POSTSTAGE1_CONFIGURE_FLAGS): Add libsupc++ to
> link directories.
> * Makefile.in: Rebuild.
>
> Index: Makefile.tpl
> ===
AIX needs libsupc++ for libstdc++ static linking.
* Makefile.tpl (POSTSTAGE1_CONFIGURE_FLAGS): Add libsupc++ to
link directories.
* Makefile.in: Rebuild.
Index: Makefile.tpl
===
--- Makefile.tpl(revision 17648
hi all
i am working with cross compiler version gcc - 4.1.2
our team has ported the c & c++ cross compiler for our target processor.
i have a task of testing the c++ cross compiler, i just want to know about the
test suites available for c++, and i have the following questions
for gcc there are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 20.07.2011 17:25, schrieb Jonathan Wakely:
> This should go to the libstdc++ list or even better to bugzilla, thanks
>
>
>
> On 20/07/2011, Rainer Emrich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there is a big issue in the gcc-4.6 series.
> On mingw libstdc++-6.dll ex
Feel the burn^Wchurn!
On 20/07/2011, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Diego Novillo writes:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 08:41, Richard Guenther
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Which is good as it increases testing coverage. We probably would have
>>> missed this bug completely if you wouldn't have notice it.
>>
Toon Moene writes:
> On 07/19/2011 08:33 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
>>> 2011-07-15 Ian Lance Taylor
>>>
>>> * configure.ac: Add --enable-build-poststage1-with-cxx. If set,
>>> make C++ a boot_language. Set and substitute
>>> POSTSTAGE1_CONFIGURE_FLAGS.
>>> * Makefile.tpl (PO
On 07/19/2011 08:33 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
2011-07-15 Ian Lance Taylor
* configure.ac: Add --enable-build-poststage1-with-cxx. If set,
make C++ a boot_language. Set and substitute
POSTSTAGE1_CONFIGURE_FLAGS.
* Makefile.tpl (POSTSTAGE1_CONFIGURE_FLAGS): Ne
Diego Novillo writes:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 08:41, Richard Guenther
> wrote:
>
>> Which is good as it increases testing coverage. We probably would have
>> missed this bug completely if you wouldn't have notice it.
>
> Agreed. The pain we feel due to this is similar to the pain one feels
>
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 08:41, Richard Guenther
wrote:
> Which is good as it increases testing coverage. We probably would have
> missed this bug completely if you wouldn't have notice it.
Agreed. The pain we feel due to this is similar to the pain one feels
after exercising vigorously.
Dieg
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 2:36 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 5:43 AM, Jonathan Wakely
> wrote:
>
>> Paolo has committed a change to that code, does it help the AIX bootstrap
>> issue?
>
> Paolo's patch gets me past the debug.cc issue.
>
> Using C++ on AIX will greatly increa
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 5:43 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Paolo has committed a change to that code, does it help the AIX bootstrap
> issue?
Paolo's patch gets me past the debug.cc issue.
Using C++ on AIX will greatly increase the bootstrap time on AIX
because configure is much slower, even us
dwarf2out.c:multiple_reg_loc_descriptor has the code:
size = GET_MODE_SIZE (GET_MODE (XVECEXP (regs, 0, 0)));
loc_result = NULL;
for (i = 0; i < XVECLEN (regs, 0); ++i)
{
dw_loc_descr_ref t;
t = one_reg_loc_descriptor (REGNO (XVECEXP (regs, 0, i)),
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
there is a big issue in the gcc-4.6 series.
On mingw libstdc++-6.dll exports only:
atomic_flag_clear_explicit
atomic_flag_test_and_set_explicit
The gcc-4.5 series is fine.
Rainer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Com
On 20 July 2011 09:35, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 20 July 2011 02:14, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>>
>>> I got agreement from two global reviewers and no objections.
>>>
>>> I have committed this patch.
>>>
>>> Please let me know about any pro
On 20 July 2011 01:04, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> C99 doesn't even support .c[6] syntax for initializers, it's a GCC extension.
Apologies, C99 does support that, my mistake.
But you can still only initialize one member of a union.
DJ Delorie wrote:
> Ian Lance Taylor writes:
>> I don't think anybody has ever done this. At the moment only plugins
>> add new passes. But I agree that backends clearly need to be able to do
>> this, and some passes need to move into the appropriate backends. I
>> would encourage you to fix th
On 20 July 2011 02:14, David Edelsohn wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
>> I got agreement from two global reviewers and no objections.
>>
>> I have committed this patch.
>>
>> Please let me know about any problems.
>
> This also breaks bootstrap on AIX. I cannot
29 matches
Mail list logo
