On 07/06/2011 12:34 AM, Diego Novillo wrote:
Is there a canonical way that we should use to rebuild the
elements from scope_chain->bindings? Could we not simply add
them to the current translation unit's scope_chain->bindings
as-is, instead of doing all these pushdecl calls?
That would probabl
Jason,
We are having several issues re-instantiating symbols and
namespaces from a pph image. We are not handling all the cases
and the contortions we are going through are getting increasingly
bizarre. Perhaps you could give us a few pointers?
When we write the contents of a header file into a
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> The implementation of TARGET_SCHED_PROLOG is incompatible with
> some coming changes to how dwarf2 cfi is to be generated.
>
> Some suggested solutions are:
>
> (1) Remove the option. Is it really that interesting
> beyond -mno-sched
Snapshot gcc-4.4-20110705 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.4-20110705/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.4 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
Hello Philip + Dimitrios
Thanks for your posts. I am another GSOC student. I am working on the
Fortran front-end of GCC (gfortran). Like most GFortran developers, my
background is more in the natural sciences (astrophysics in my case)
rather than computer science.
My project is to help add c
This brings google/gcc-4_6 up to rev 175849.
Diego.
Jon Grant writes:
> Ian Lance Taylor wrote, On 03/07/11 05:27:
>> Jon Grant writes:
> [.]
>>> Another reply for this old thread. I wondered, if collect2 is
>>> possibly not needed in normal use on GNU/Linux, could GCC be
>>> configured to call ld directly in those cases to save launching
>>> an
Hi Philip,
thanks for writing your experiences, I found it very useful. I certainly
like the idea of having such a thread every once in a while, just to keep
everyone updated about our projects. I'm also curious to learn about the
experiences of other students that are writing code for GCC for
This merge brings the pph branch up to rev 175832. No new
failures nor merge conflicts this time.
Tested on x86_64.
Diego.
FYI. I added some more slides and a group picture to
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GCCGathering2011
Diego.
Michael Matz writes:
> On Tue, 5 Jul 2011, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> FWIW, the reason I asked was because I'm using a splay tree in a patch
>> that I hope to send soon. The libiberty structures are a bit heavyweight,
>> with the hooks stored alongside the root pointer, and with each node
>> bei
This is the last merge from google/main into google/gcc-4_6 (rev
175816).
After this merge, both google/integration and google/main will
resume tracking trunk. From now on, any changes needed from
trunk or any other google branch, will need to be backported to
google/gcc-4_6.
Merges from gcc-4_6
Hi,
On Tue, 5 Jul 2011, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> FWIW, the reason I asked was because I'm using a splay tree in a patch
> that I hope to send soon. The libiberty structures are a bit heavyweight,
> with the hooks stored alongside the root pointer, and with each node
> being a separate structur
Michael Matz writes:
>> > There were other people pointing out issues with the splay tree (but
>> > all w/o copyright assignment and much larger patches).
>> >
>> > I know I did the last re-write of this piece of code but it's been a
>> > long time ... in any case, previous reports were that th
14 matches
Mail list logo
