Ralf Wildenhues writes:
> Libtool recently added a configure test for @file support in ar
> (and other tools) in order to avoid the slower partial building
> or static libraries on some systems (and have an escape route on
> systems where the archiver doesn't allow adding to an archive).
>
> Now,
ТанÑÑÑÑÐ°Ñ cÑÑkа Ð´Ð¾Ð»Ð±Ð¸Ñ Ð¼ÐµÐ¶Ð´Ñ Ð½Ð¾Ð³
banana.com.mk/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/data3.html
Snapshot gcc-4.3-20100822 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.3-20100822/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.3 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
Hello GCC developers,
Libtool recently added a configure test for @file support in ar
(and other tools) in order to avoid the slower partial building
or static libraries on some systems (and have an escape route on
systems where the archiver doesn't allow adding to an archive).
Now, to avoid issu
Hello,
I have a runnable (fortran) test on which I want to check that a
conditional part is optimized away.
Here are the corresponding tree-dump directives :
! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "_gfortran_abort" 32 "original" } }
! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "_gfortran_abort" 30 "optimiz
That does the trick.
Thanks,
steve
-Original Message-
From: Ian Lance Taylor [mailto:i...@google.com]
Sent: 21 August 2010 19:50
To: Kilbane, Stephen
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: CLEAR_INSN_CACHE
"Kilbane, Stephen" writes:
> I'm trying to add support to 4.3 for cache flushing when
> > PR45112. See also http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-08/msg00283.html
>
> Thanks a lot for info.
> If I got the discussion right, it's ok for the definition to use more
> strict alignment than the declaration.
Not quite. Any mismatch is user error, and may cause nasal daemons.
Whether thi
