gcc-4.4-20100817 is now available

2010-08-17 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-4.4-20100817 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.4-20100817/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.4 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches

Re: x86 assembler syntax

2010-08-17 Thread Basile Starynkevitch
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 14:13 -0400, David Edelsohn wrote: > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:56 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > > James Dennett writes: > > > >> Apart from using the name gcc@gcc.gnu.org for the help list, and > >> gcc-...@gcc.gnu.org for developers (who should be able to find the > >> rig

Re: x86 assembler syntax

2010-08-17 Thread David Edelsohn
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:56 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > James Dennett writes: > >> Apart from using the name gcc@gcc.gnu.org for the help list, and >> gcc-...@gcc.gnu.org for developers (who should be able to find the >> right list)? > > I tend to agree that we should change the name of the g

Re: complex numbers in gcc

2010-08-17 Thread Richard Henderson
On 08/17/2010 06:20 AM, roy rosen wrote: > 2. Is there a way to remove this pass and keep coherency of the > following passes, so that in the RTL stage I would be able to handle > complex numbers (CHI/CSI) and not the decomposed code? By adjusting the rules as to what's legal GIMPLE, yes. This ma

Re: legal work before submitting patches to GCC?

2010-08-17 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
"Petar Jovanovic" writes: > the company I work for, RT-RK, http://www.rt-rk.com, intends to contribute > some optimization patches to GCC for MIPS32. These optimization patches have > been developed in cooperation with MIPS Technologies, and we have been > advised by them to contact you in order

Re: x86 assembler syntax

2010-08-17 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Sun, 15 Aug 2010, Rick Hodgin wrote: > For what it's worth. One of the pages I went to had the email address as > g...@gnu.org, not even g...@gcc.gnu.org. Somebody corrected me on that > already too. :-) Both addresses -- gcc@gcc.gnu.org and g...@gnu.org -- actually work, interchangably. I d

Re: Performance optimizations for Intel Core 2 and Core i7 processors

2010-08-17 Thread Maxim Kuvyrkov
On 8/13/10 11:40 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 10:44:57AM +0400, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: CodeSourcery is working on improving performance for Intel's Core 2 and Core i7 families of processors. CodeSourcery plans to add support for unaligned vector instructions, to provide fine-t

complex numbers in gcc

2010-08-17 Thread roy rosen
Hi all, In my port the architecture has some specific instructions that can handle complex arithmetic. I tried to use them but I see that pass_lower_complex decompose the complex numbers. I tried to remove this pass from the passes' list but I saw that the subsequent passes require that this pass

legal work before submitting patches to GCC?

2010-08-17 Thread Petar Jovanovic
Dear Sir or Madam, the company I work for, RT-RK, http://www.rt-rk.com, intends to contribute some optimization patches to GCC for MIPS32. These optimization patches have been developed in cooperation with MIPS Technologies, and we have been advised by them to contact you in order to the legal wor

Re: x86 assembler syntax

2010-08-17 Thread Richard Kenner
> > Apart from using the name gcc@gcc.gnu.org for the help list, and > > gcc-...@gcc.gnu.org for developers (who should be able to find the > > right list)? > > I tend to agree that we should change the name of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org > mailing list. I don't think it'll help. "gcc-dev: that's the li

A minor mistake in cse_main?

2010-08-17 Thread Amker.Cheng
Hi : In function cse_main, gcc processes ebb path by path. firstly, gcc finds the first bb of path in the reverse post order queue, plus if the bb is still not visited. then gcc finds all paths starting with that first bb. the corresponding code is like: do { bb = BASIC_