Andrew MacLeod writes:
>>> -fmemory-model=single - Enable all data races introductions, as they
>>> are today. (relax all 4 internal restrictions.)
>>
>> One could still use this mode with a multi-threaded program as long as
>> explicit synchronization is done, right?
>
> Right. Its just a si
Snapshot gcc-4.4-20100511 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.4-20100511/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.4 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
I discovered that if you build a plain arm-elf toolchain, the default
float-abis for gcc and gas don't match. I added this patch locally to
make it "just work" but it seems to me it would be better to have the
defaults match, although I'm not sure how to enforce that. Comments?
Suggestions?
Ind
On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 10:42 -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> >
> > I was wondering if anyone has built GCC using a CFLAGS (and CXXFLAGS)
> > setting
> > that causes GCC to generate code that is not compatibile with the default
> > GCC output. Basical
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 01:12:45PM -0700, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> Not sure where to send this, who is responsible for the mail server
> for gcc.gnu.org?
The admins can be reached at overse...@gcc.gnu.org .
Not sure where to send this, who is responsible for the mail server
for gcc.gnu.org?
--- Start of forwarded message ---
Subject: [gnu.org #572859] [gcc-bugs-h...@gcc.gnu.org: ezmlm warning]
From: "Ward Vandewege via RT"
To: a...@gnu.org
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 10:28:41 -0400
> [...@gnu.o
On 05/11/2010 02:28 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
It isn't very clear that refs/heads was changed to refs/remotes.
Sure. The git-svn mirror puts everything under refs/remotes, then the
git mirror maintainers manually create the equivalent of symbolic links
under refs/heads for some branches.
I don't
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 05/11/2010 11:21 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 7:49 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
>
>>> git config --add remote.origin.fetch
>>> refs/remotes/vect256:refs/remotes/origin/vect256
>>> git config --add svn-remote.svn.fetch
>>>
"H.J. Lu" writes:
> From:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GitMirror
>
> remotes/origin/ix86 is still listed. I did a clone of
>
> git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git
>
> and I got x86 branch.
Try running "git remote prune origin".
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint =
On 05/11/2010 11:21 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 7:49 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
git config --add remote.origin.fetch
refs/remotes/vect256:refs/remotes/origin/vect256
git config --add svn-remote.svn.fetch
branches/vect256:refs/remotes/origin/vect256
I was hoping
git://gcc.gnu
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 7:49 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 05/11/2010 10:30 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>
>> I created a branch for 256bit vectorizer, branches/vect256/. Richard
>> and I will work on it to extend vectorizer to 256bit.
>>
>> Jason, can you include it in git mirror? We can drop the ix86 br
On 05/11/2010 10:30 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
I created a branch for 256bit vectorizer, branches/vect256/. Richard
and I will work on it to extend vectorizer to 256bit.
Jason, can you include it in git mirror? We can drop the ix86 branch
in git since there are several branches under branches/ix86.
I
Hi,
I created a branch for 256bit vectorizer, branches/vect256/. Richard
and I will work on it to extend vectorizer to 256bit.
Jason, can you include it in git mirror? We can drop the ix86 branch
in git since there are several branches under branches/ix86.
Thanks.
--
H.J.
> Note that for copyright purposes a series of unrelated small changes
> counts as a big change. If you truly can't do the paperwork, then
> it's probably best for the project if you avoid sending actual
> patches. Sorry about that.
A series of *related* small changes certainly would count as a
"Paulo J. Matos" writes:
> I have a backend and I would like to have a systematic way to know if
> my testsuite covers all the define_insn and define_expand rules in my
> md file.
>
> What's the best way to achieve this?
For define_insn you can use the -da option, and scan the debug files
for
On Tue, 11 May 2010, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Marc Glisse writes:
On Tue, 11 May 2010, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
And you can use -Wl,-O1 (pass -O1 to the linker) to let the linker
determine optimal size of the hash table (minimum number of collisions
for reasonably sized section).
Was it consid
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> [ Moved to gcc@gcc.gnu.org ]
> Hmm, it did not detect elf_getshdrstrndx and yet it tried to use it
> later on. I think that's the bug. Yes, please file a bug. I believe
> it's going to be easy to fix, though. There should be an unguarded
>
Jay K writes:
> Understood, but I'll have to stick to "small" changes as I can't get the
> papers.
Note that for copyright purposes a series of unrelated small changes
counts as a big change. If you truly can't do the paperwork, then
it's probably best for the project if you avoid sending actu
On 05/11/2010 11:34 AM, wolfgang8...@gmx.de wrote:
Hello All,
I want to know if it is possible to modify AST of the C/C++-Language.
You can modify a middle end representation of source program. I am not
sure if it always should be called an AST.
What I would like to do is to add some argum
Marc Glisse writes:
> On Tue, 11 May 2010, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
>> And you can use -Wl,-O1 (pass -O1 to the linker) to let the linker
>> determine optimal size of the hash table (minimum number of collisions
>> for reasonably sized section).
>
> Was it considered enabling this automatically wit
[ Moved to gcc@gcc.gnu.org ]
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 08:46, Sandeep Soni wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
>> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 02:24, Sandeep Soni wrote:
>>
>>> I installed elfutils-libelf-devel-0.145-1 and that worked.
>>
>> Yes. Older libelfs will not work
Miles Bader wrote:
Andrew MacLeod writes:
-fmemory-model=single - Enable all data races introductions, as they
are today. (relax all 4 internal restrictions.)
One could still use this mode with a multi-threaded program as long as
explicit synchronization is done, right?
Right
Hi,
I have a backend and I would like to have a systematic way to know if
my testsuite covers all the define_insn and define_expand rules in my
md file.
What's the best way to achieve this?
I initially thought I could use gcov to check the coverage of the code
that is generated from the md file
On Tue, 11 May 2010, Revital1 Eres wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a question regarding the process of bundling and NOPs insertion for
> VLIW architecture
> and I appreciate your answer:
>
> I am calling the second scheduler from the machine reorg pass; similar to
> what is done for IA64.
> I no
On Tue, 11 May 2010, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
And you can use -Wl,-O1 (pass -O1 to the linker) to let the linker
determine optimal size of the hash table (minimum number of collisions
for reasonably sized section).
Was it considered enabling this automatically with -O3 (or -Ofast) when we
know th
Understood, but I'll have to stick to "small" changes as I can't get the papers.
Uros pointed to:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-05/msg00657.html
which appears to just be *very* coincident timing.
So I Rainer will fix it soon.
I have a patch now based on that discussion.
I used:
cas
Hello,
I have a question regarding the process of bundling and NOPs insertion for
VLIW architecture
and I appreciate your answer:
I am calling the second scheduler from the machine reorg pass; similar to
what is done for IA64.
I now want to handle the bundling and NOPs insertion for VLIW archite
Hello All,
I want to know if it is possible to modify AST of the C/C++-Language.
What I would like to do is to add some arguments to some function calls or add
statements somewhere in the tree.
Now I am looking for the root node to modify it. Which is the best pass for
that? Is there anywhere sa
> Proposed patch below/attached.
> (-w to hide indent change)
See http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html for guidelines.
> I'll open a bug.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs for guidelines.
Generally speaking, posting a patch inlined in a message on gcc@gcc.gnu.org
will most likely result in it being
Solaris 2.9 x86 gcc 4.5.0 configure -without-gnu-as -with-as=/usr/ccs/bin/as
=> Assembly syntax errors in gcov.c whereever there is rep prefix.
I was actually looking for a problem with lock prefixes on 4.3 -- testing
4.5.0, found this instead, which is about about the same.
See:
http
30 matches
Mail list logo
