On Sun, 2010-03-21 at 03:40 +0800, fanqifei wrote:
> foor_expand_move is changed and it works now.
> However, I still don't understand why there was no such error if below
> condition was used and foor_expand_move was not changed.
> Both below condition and "(register_operand(operands[0], SImode) |
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 2:47 AM, Jim Wilson wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-03-20 at 14:29 +0800, fanqifei wrote:
>> I changed the condition in "*mov_insn_mode" to below:
>> (register_operand(operands[0], SImode) ||
>> register_operand(operands[1],SImode))
>
> I think you need the same change in foor_
On Sat, 2010-03-20 at 14:29 +0800, fanqifei wrote:
> I changed the condition in "*mov_insn_mode" to below:
> (register_operand(operands[0], SImode) ||
> register_operand(operands[1],SImode))
I think you need the same change in foor_expand_move. I.e., if neither
the source or dest is a regis
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Tadashi Koike wrote:
> Hi all,
> (* I am weak in English, so pleas forgive my English mistake.)
>
> Please teach me about a behavior of -save-temps=obj option
> on gcc 4.5. A behavior I found is whether bug or specification ?
>
> [ summary ]
> compiling is
Hi all,
(* I am weak in English, so pleas forgive my English mistake.)
Please teach me about a behavior of -save-temps=obj option
on gcc 4.5. A behavior I found is whether bug or specification ?
[ summary ]
compiling is failed when more than two source file are
specified with both -