On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 20:17 -0800, Joe Buck wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 05:31:03PM -0800, Jerry Quinn wrote:
> > There is renewed interest in getting a D compiler into the GCC sources.
> > The most direct route for this to happen is to use the existing Digital
> > Mars DMD front end.
> >
> >
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Steve White wrote:
> Hi, Andrew!
>
> Thanks for the suggestion, but it didn't make any difference for me.
> Neither the speed nor the assembler was significantly altered.
>
> Which version of gcc did you use? Mine is 4.4.1.
>
> I threw everything at it:
> g
Hi, Andrew!
Thanks for the suggestion, but it didn't make any difference for me.
Neither the speed nor the assembler was significantly altered.
Which version of gcc did you use? Mine is 4.4.1.
I threw everything at it:
gcc -std=c99 -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -mmmx -msse -msse2
-mf
Bernd Roesch writes:
> What Option i need set that GCC do this in FPU register ?
There is none, this is part of the target description. See
(gccint)Scalar Return for the related target macros.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 0
Richard Guenther wrote:
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Franz Fehringer wrote:
but an OS update could lead to updated C runtime headers?
Yes.
There is still one point I don't understand about fixincludes.
Why is it still useful on recent GNU/Linux systems?
From what I understood, fixi
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Steve White wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently revised some speed tests of basic CPU operations.
> There were a few surprises, but one was that, a test of double-precision
> divide was a factor of ten slower when compiled with gcc than with the
> Intel compiler icc.
>
> T
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Steve White wrote:
> gcc has this (gcc -std=c99 -O3 -msse2 -mfpmath=sse -lm -S dt.c)
> icc has this (icc -Wall -w2 -fast -c dt.c)
icc's -fast is equivalent to gcc's -ffast-math option which you did
not supply so you comparing apples to oranges.
Note supplying -ff
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Franz Fehringer wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> understood.
> but an OS update could lead to updated C runtime headers?
Yes.
Richard.
Hi,
I recently revised some speed tests of basic CPU operations.
There were a few surprises, but one was that, a test of double-precision
divide was a factor of ten slower when compiled with gcc than with the
Intel compiler icc.
This was with full optimization turned on, with an Intel Duo (Yonah
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
understood.
but an OS update could lead to updated C runtime headers?
Am 23.01.2010 17:39, schrieb Richard Guenther:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Franz Fehringer wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Franz Fehringer wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have two hopefully not too dull questions about the gcc fixincludes
> mechanism:
> 1) When after the initial fixinclude run (parts of) new software is
> installed into /usr/i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I have two hopefully not too dull questions about the gcc fixincludes
mechanism:
1) When after the initial fixinclude run (parts of) new software is
installed into /usr/include, the fixincludes run has to be repeated (at
least in principle), i
Hello Ian
Thank you for the quick reply with explanations.
2010/1/19 Ian Lance Taylor :
> Jon Grant writes:
>
>> Any easy way to evaluate and reduce command lines? Consider this:
>>
>> /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.3.3/../../../../lib/crt1.o
>>
>> Is actually the same as: /usr/lib/crt1.o -- whi
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Olivier Galibert wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 09:21:47AM -0500, Joern Rennecke wrote:
>> [This started on gcc-patches]
>> Quoting Richard Guenther :
> [...]
>> > bool all_critical_edge_p = true;
>> > all_critical_edge_p &= e->flags & EDGE_CRITICAL;
> [...]
>>
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 09:21:47AM -0500, Joern Rennecke wrote:
> [This started on gcc-patches]
> Quoting Richard Guenther :
[...]
> > bool all_critical_edge_p = true;
> > all_critical_edge_p &= e->flags & EDGE_CRITICAL;
[...]
> I think a better long-term plan would be to add an option to insert
[This started on gcc-patches]
Quoting Richard Guenther :
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 01/23/2010 01:36 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
Ugh. I wonder if we should use _Bool instead of int
if the host compiler supports it.
Then we'd have another share of bugs if someo
Hi,
I use same compiler settings -m68060
a call of a function and return value with double float is on all
m68k-amigaos compiler (that use only other 68k config files but same main
source) as this.
jsr testfunc
move.l d1,-(sp)
move.l d0,-(sp)
fdmove.d (sp)+,fp1
fsmove.x fp1,f
Jerry Quinn wrote:
Hi, folks,
There is renewed interest in getting a D compiler into the GCC sources.
The most direct route for this to happen is to use the existing Digital
Mars DMD front end.
The current DMD front end code is GPL licensed, and copyright is owned
by Digital Mars. If they were
18 matches
Mail list logo
