Re: IRA memory cost calculation

2009-12-01 Thread Michael Eager
Jeff Law wrote: On 11/30/09 14:48, Michael Eager wrote: Jeff Law wrote: On 11/30/09 14:17, Michael Eager wrote: I've run into a situation where assign_hard_reg() decides that there are no registers available. That can certainly happen. It's also the case that assign_hard_reg may decide that

Re: [Patch, libfortran] PR 40812 Large file support on MinGW

2009-12-01 Thread Danny Smith
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 7:18 AM, Janne Blomqvist wrote: > Hi, > > the attached patch should make gfortran support > 2 GB files on MinGW. > I don't have a windows installation to test on, so I don't know if > this works or not. Though I regtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu to > make sure that non-M

gcc-4.4-20091201 is now available

2009-12-01 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-4.4-20091201 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.4-20091201/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.4 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches

Re: Delay loaded shared objects

2009-12-01 Thread Robert Huo
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:18 AM, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 11/30/2009 02:53 PM, Robert Huo wrote: >> >> Does gcc/g++ (on a typical Linux platform) supports delayed loaded >> shared objects similar to the /DELAYLOAD option of MSVC [1]? > > No. > > The glibc elf.h file defines (and thus presumab

[Patch, libfortran] PR 40812 Large file support on MinGW

2009-12-01 Thread Janne Blomqvist
Hi, the attached patch should make gfortran support > 2 GB files on MinGW. I don't have a windows installation to test on, so I don't know if this works or not. Though I regtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu to make sure that non-MinGW targets didn't change (it's all behind #ifdefs, but just to be

ICE on unique_ptr

2009-12-01 Thread Piotr Wyderski
GCC-4.5-trunk/Cygwin ICEs in the following way: /opt/gcc-trunk/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.5.0/include/c++/bits/unique_ptr.h:233:5: internal compiler error: in finish_member_declaration, at cp/semantics.c:2416 I can't provide a testcase. Best regards Piotr Wyderski

Re: issue building ppl with trunk

2009-12-01 Thread Jason Merrill
On 12/01/2009 09:02 AM, Rainer Emrich wrote: C:/MinGW/i686-pc/i686-pc/i686-pc/gcc-4.5.0/mingw/lib/libppl.a(Polyhedron_widenings.o):Polyhedron_widenings.cc:(.text$_ZN23Parma_Polyhedra_Library3BoxINS_8IntervalI10__gmp_exprIA1_12__mpq_structS4_ENS_25Interval_Restriction_NoneINS_20Interval_Info_Bitse

issue building ppl with trunk

2009-12-01 Thread Rainer Emrich
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Since beginning of November trunk fails to build ppl properly at least on *-*-mingw32 targets. ppl itself builds, but building cloog-ppl or bootstrapping gcc fails: C:/MinGW/i686-pc/i686-pc/i686-pc/gcc-4.5.0/mingw/lib/libppl.a(Polyhedron_widenings.o):

Plugin callback interface (Was: plugin events for ICI)

2009-12-01 Thread Joern Rennecke
Quoting Richard Guenther : (Btw, why does invoke_plugin_callbacks not return a value, that would make code way more readable than going through the passed by reference appearant return value ...) Actually, I made it return a value that indicates if a callback took place. But apparently you want

Re: Support for VLE code in PowerPC

2009-12-01 Thread Nick Clifton
Hi Kaushik, We are planning to support the same in binutils, gcc and newlib. Please let us know if you have any suggestions to implement this support for easier FSF approval. Please make sure that you have an FSF Binutils Copyright assignment in place. Please follow the GNU Coding Standards

Re: MPC required in one week.

2009-12-01 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 11/30/2009 09:47 PM, Michael Witten wrote: On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote: The patch which makes the MPC library a hard requirement for GCC bootstrapping has been approved today. Out of curiosity and ignorance: Why, specifically, is MPC going to be a hard requiremen

Re: Question about filling multi delay slots

2009-12-01 Thread Amker.Cheng
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:31 AM, Jeff Law wrote: > On 11/25/09 07:34, Amker.Cheng wrote: > > First, it's worth noting very few targets support multiple delay slots and > as a result that code isn't tested nearly as well as handling of single > delay slots. > > I'm pretty sure we assume that the fi