Re: "uninitialized variable" warning from compiler

Uma shankar writes: > a)  The compiler activates the warning mechanism only if  optimisation > is enabled  at compilation time with -O option. For all the bugs that > I went  through at bugzilla, the failure is not  -O level dependent. > The warning-failure occurs for  all levels of optimisation

Re: SHN_UNDEF symbols with non-zero value in MIPS shared object

Uma shankar writes: > Cross-MIPS gcc version (for Linux target) used is  4.3.2 > > Today  I saw that .so files of MIPS contain some undef symbols with > non-zero value > > The few I saw are defined in libC > > Wont this confuse dynamic linker of 4.3.2  ?  ( i know that in 4.3.3. > , there is the

Re: Possibly gcc/ld bug

Bluddy writes: > Notice that ld is chaining LO16 relocations after HI16's. However, it's > doing something completely illegal since the LO16 for 08aecb54 is not > preceded by a valid HI16 entry! ld got confused by the two address ranges. While the calculation of a HI16 reloc requires the LO16 r

Re: MPC 0.8 prerelease tarball (last release before MPC is mandatory!)

From: "Allan McRae" Nothing exotic: i686-pc-linux-gnu & x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Both: === All 57 tests passed === gcc-4.4.2 mpfr-2.4.1 gmp-4.3.1 Also fine on i686-pc-linux-gnu with gcc-4.5-20091008 Allan Thanks!

Re: MPC 0.8 prerelease tarball (last release before MPC is mandatory!)

From: "David Fang" On powerpc-apple-darwin8: gmp: 4.3.1 mpfr: 2.4.1 % gcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: powerpc-apple-darwin8 Configured with: /var/tmp/gcc/gcc-5370~2/src/configure --disable-checking -enable-werror --prefix=/usr --mandir=/share/man --enable-languages=c,objc,c++,obj-c++

gcc-4.5-20091029 is now available

Snapshot gcc-4.5-20091029 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.5-20091029/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.5 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk

"uninitialized variable" warning from compiler

Hi,      I have few questions about  inbuilt mechanism of  gcc/g++  for warning about  uninitialized variable. I am interested in cases where  compiler is unable to warn.  I  am aware that all the known bugs about  warning-failure are mentioned  at  bugzilla   http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug

SHN_UNDEF symbols with non-zero value in MIPS shared object

Hi, Cross-MIPS gcc version (for Linux target) used is  4.3.2 Today  I saw that .so files of MIPS contain some undef symbols with non-zero value The few I saw are defined in libC Wont this confuse dynamic linker of 4.3.2  ?  ( i know that in 4.3.3. , there is the STO_MIPS_PLT check  which  skip

MPC 0.8 prerelease tarball (last release before MPC is mandatory!)

A prerelease tarball of the upcoming mpc-0.8 is available here: http://www.multiprecision.org/mpc/download/mpc-0.8-dev.tar.gz This release is feature complete with respect to C99 and GCC's needs. So I expect to make this version be the one made mandatory for the gcc-4.5 release. If there are any

Re: simplify_relational_operation and unsigned char

Amir Gonnen wrote: > Perhaps EQ and NE could be treated as unsigned, like the > GEU,LEU,GTU,LTU operators? :) What exactly is "signed equality" and how does/would it differ from "unsigned equality"? I'm not sure the concept makes any sense! (And that's always a warning sign that your diagnosi

Re: simplify_relational_operation and unsigned char

On 10/29/2009 03:35 AM, Amir Gonnen wrote: rtx test = simplify_relational_operation(EQ, VOIDmode, QImode, reg, GEN_INT(129)); CONST_INT is always signed. If you really wrote this as you quote here, that would be the breakage. Try gen_int_mode (129, QImode) instead. r~

Re: [PATCH][LTO] Fix PR41858

On Thu, 29 Oct 2009, Toon Moene wrote: > Richard Guenther wrote: > > > On Thu, 29 Oct 2009, Toon Moene wrote: > > > > > You wrote: > > > > > > > I refrained from adding a 4000 file testcase ;) > > > Never mind - I have one. I didn't understand why lto1 said this: > > > > > > /usr/snp/lib/gcc/

Re: [PATCH][LTO] Fix PR41858

Richard Guenther wrote: On Thu, 29 Oct 2009, Toon Moene wrote: You wrote: I refrained from adding a 4000 file testcase ;) Never mind - I have one. I didn't understand why lto1 said this: /usr/snp/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.5.0/../../../../x86_64-unknown-linux -gnu/bin/ld: fatal er

Re: [PATCH][LTO] Fix PR41858

On Thu, 29 Oct 2009, Toon Moene wrote: > You wrote: > > > I refrained from adding a 4000 file testcase ;) > > Never mind - I have one. I didn't understand why lto1 said this: > > /usr/snp/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.5.0/../../../../x86_64-unknown-linux > -gnu/bin/ld: fatal error: could

[PATCH][LTO] Fix PR41858

You wrote: > I refrained from adding a 4000 file testcase ;) Never mind - I have one. I didn't understand why lto1 said this: /usr/snp/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.5.0/../../../../x86_64-unknown-linux -gnu/bin/ld: fatal error: could not open/create temporary file while dealing with the

Possibly gcc/ld bug

I'm pretty sure I found a bug in psp-gcc (or actually in ld). It may be with the specific psp-gcc/ld bfd or it may be in ld itself. I'm not sure this is the right forum to post this, but hopefully the experts can assist me. I'm working on the PSP (MIPS architecture), doing some unusual linking in

simplify_relational_operation and unsigned char

(gcc-4.4.1) Hi, I found out some strange behavior of simplify_relational_operation. Apparently it assumes QImode is signed even though this could not be deduced from the EQ operator. Here is an example: rtx reg = gen_reg_rtx(QImode); ... rtx test = simplify_relational_operation(EQ, VOIDmode, QImo