Hello Eric,
* Eric Niebler wrote on Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 01:41:38AM CEST:
> checking whether the C compiler works... configure: error: in
> `/home/ericne/objdir/i686-pc-cygwin/li
> biberty':
> configure: error: cannot run C compiled programs.
> If you meant to cross compile, use `--host'.
> See `c
> How does this work? ASM_FORMAT_PRIVATE_NAME is not supposed
> to completely ignore the NAME argument, the function may well
> be called with the same LABELNO but different NAME strings,
> and this must not result in conflicting symbols ...
I have compiled the entire GCC and not come up with an
(Resurrecting this old thread...)
Seiji Kachi wrote:
Kai Tietz wrote:
No, this bug appeared on all windows pe-coff targets. A fix for this
is already checked in yesterday on binutils. Could you try it with the
current binutils head version?
Cheers,
Kai
I solved this failure with binutils-2.1
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 12:00 +0200, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:08:00 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >On 12.08.2009 23:07, Martin Guy wrote:
> >> On 8/12/09, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >>> So any ACATS results from any other ARM target would be
> >>> appreciated.
> >>
> >> I
Andrew Haley wrote:
> One thing that you may like to consider is compiling
> more packages with -findirect-dispatch -fno-indirect-classes. This has a
> smallish performance penalty, but packages compiled this way have no link-
> time dependencies on other packages. Instead, everything gets fixed
Dave Korn wrote:
> Not simple, but not so hard as to be impossible either; as it turns out, the
> internal structure of libgcj looks a lot like a turnip, with a bunch of skinny
> branchy foliage waving around on top, a few shallow roots spreading under the
> ground, and a big ball of hair in the
That was also the conclusion I came to. I was now wondering why GREG
allows itself to change that register from r0 to r3. Is there any
reason?
It seems to me that the most likely reason is that it considers in
this case r0 as undefined and thus can modify it to r3 because of
this. I was wondering
On 20.08.2009 10:16, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 17.08.2009 12:00, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:08:00 +0200, Matthias Klose
wrote:
On 12.08.2009 23:07, Martin Guy wrote:
On 8/12/09, Joel Sherrill wrote:
So any ACATS results from any other ARM target would be
appreciated.
I l
On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 15:25 -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 08/21/2009 02:37 PM, Jerry Quinn wrote:
> > OK, I've gotten almost this far and can bootstrap (the asterisk is
> > actually not the very first char and I have to figure that out).
> > However, in the referenced test case, both typeinf
[ Reviving a thread from 20090506, as the first step toward raising this issue
again on the lists, and just in case anyone was interested in the follow-on ...
]
David Daney wrote:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>> Hello Dave,
>>
>> * Dave Korn wrote on Wed, May 06, 2009 at 06:09:05PM CEST:
> [...]
>>>
10 matches
Mail list logo
