On 08/03/2009 03:52 PM, Unruh, Erwin wrote:
2) Is this a bug?
I think it's a bug in the specification.
User-specified CFLAGS are always passed last in the Makefiles (at least
for Automake, but it is a good practice in general) so that the user can
override options like -D, -U, -O, -g, -f, -m
2009/8/3 Jim Wilson :
> On 08/03/2009 02:14 AM, Mohamed Shafi wrote:
>>
>> short - 2 bytes
>> i am not able to implement the alignment for short.
>> The following is are the macros that i used for this
>> #define PARM_BOUNDARY 8
>> #define STACK_BOUNDARY 64
>
> You haven't explained what the actual
I haven't been following GCC, so I need to thank Jason for forwarding
this issue to me.
I just read through the messages on the list, and had some more comments:
+/* relayout again -- to allow for implicit
+ * parameters to have been added to the capture if it was a
+ * 'default ca
Jason Merrill wrote:
Experimenting with a working version and seeing it's issues will be
useful to me. To others to maybe. With concepts
gone from C++0x and being reworked for C++15(?) maybe support for
polymorphic lambdas could be reintroduced? -- though
I'm sure its much too late for that an
On 08/03/2009 09:36 PM, Adam Butcher wrote:
Thanks. I haven't any copyright assignments on file -- this is my first
dabbling with gcc and I've been doing it
mostly to experiment with C++ lambda support and non-standard extensions such
as polymorphic lambda support.
OK. We'll need an assignm
I was improving tree aliasing for pointers by adding support a+1 and a
not aliasing. But I ran into a bug in the aliasing where:
/* If both references are through the same type, they do not alias
if the accesses do not overlap. This does extra disambiguation
for mixed/pointer accesses
Revision 150382 of the cxx0x-lambdas-branch fails to bootstrap with the
following error:
gcc -g -fkeep-inline-functions -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings
-Wcast-qual -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wmissing-format-attribute -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros
-Wno-overlength
Current trunk (revision 150381) fails to bootstrap with the following
configuration:
[pedro.lama...@larissa trunk-obj]$ ../trunk/configure
--prefix=/opt/gcc-4.5 --enable-bootstrap --enable-shared
--enable-threads=posix --enable-checking --with-system-zlib
--enable-__cxa_atexit --disable-libunwind-
On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 00:06 +0530, sumanth wrote:
> > mycompiler-gcc -g file1.c file2.c
> > mycompiler-gdb a.out
> >> when i print "a" in file1.c , i am able to see value 10;
> >> when i print "a" int file2.c, it prints , no symbol defined.
> Instead I can access it with " print _a"
This so
On 08/03/2009 08:32 AM, Larry Evans wrote:
While trying to track down the cause of:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40092
I encountered what may be an error. In pt.c around
line 2493, there's this:
if (TYPE_P (t) )
cp_walk_tree (&TYPE_CONTEXT (t), &find_parameter_packs_r, ppd, ppd
Tom Tromey wrote:
Basile> Thanks for the bug report. In fact, melt_generated_dir should be the
Basile> same as melt_source_dir
Basile> I just committed rev 150330 of MELT branch to fix that. Tom, could you
Basile> be patient & kind enough to try again! Many thanks!
Thanks, that worked.
Now to a
Hi Jim,
that seems to be a promising solution.
If I keep the prefix "_" for a global variable , there is a problem in
accessing it in gdb...let me explain you with an example
Eg: file1.c
int a = 10;
int main()
{
int b =10;
int c;
c = add( a , b);
return 0;
}
file2.c
int add( int x, int y)
{
r
On 07/29/2009 06:27 AM, Adam Butcher wrote:
Esben Mose Hansen writes:
I am completely new to gcc hacking, just
dying to get lambda into gcc 4.5 :)
Me too on both counts!
Great! Please feel free to ask me any questions you have directly. Do
you have copyright assignments on file yet? I
On 08/03/2009 02:14 AM, Mohamed Shafi wrote:
short - 2 bytes
i am not able to implement the alignment for short.
The following is are the macros that i used for this
#define PARM_BOUNDARY 8
#define STACK_BOUNDARY 64
You haven't explained what the actual problem is. Is there a problem
with glo
Basile> Thanks for the bug report. In fact, melt_generated_dir should be the
Basile> same as melt_source_dir
Basile> I just committed rev 150330 of MELT branch to fix that. Tom, could you
Basile> be patient & kind enough to try again! Many thanks!
Thanks, that worked.
Now to actually try MELT...
> "Paolo" == Paolo Bonzini writes:
Paolo> MELT looks extremely cool! You may want to use this too, however:
Paolo> http://lwn.net/Articles/315686/
Yes, I'm also looking at Coccinelle and TreeHydra.
As this is strictly a spare-time project, I am trying to find the
approach that requires the
> "Dave" == Dave Korn writes:
Dave> Were you using a --prefix? The PPL checks (by design I think) only
Dave> look for PPL in your prefix.
Dave> I do not know it; I have merely observed the behaviour. It may
Dave> even not be by design for all I know, though I suspect it makes
Dave> sense
On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 09:44 +0530, sumanth wrote:
>How can i make sure my tool chain knows the difference between
> global variable r0 and register r0.
The simple solution is to either add a prefix to variable names, or to
add a prefix to register names. In ELF, the convention is to not
Ira and Dorit,
Is there any chance that PR33113 will be addressed for
gcc 4.5? If I recall correctly, it was one of the last
major issues with vectorization in gfortran that wasn't
addressed yet. Dorit made the following comment back in
Aug 2008...
>From: Dorit Nuzman
>Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 1
In current gcc the order of options -D and -U is significant. The Single Unix(r)
Specification explicitly specifies that the order should not matter for the c89
command. It reads (cited from version 2, which is ten years old):
-D name[=value]
Define name as if by a C-language #define directive. I
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009, Nguyen Quang Minh wrote:
> I'm a C++ developer on Linux. I want you show me the ways to install
> both GCC 4.1.2 and GCC 3.2.3 on my Linux.
This question is out of scope for this mailing list which is about
the development _of_ GCC, not the development _with_ GCC.
I believe yo
While trying to track down the cause of:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40092
I encountered what may be an error. In pt.c around
line 2493, there's this:
if (TYPE_P (t) )
cp_walk_tree (&TYPE_CONTEXT (t),
&find_parameter_packs_r, ppd, ppd->visited);
However, gdb sho
On 27.07.2009 18:12, Richard Guenther wrote:
A release candidate for the GCC 4.3.4 is now available at
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.3.4-RC-20090727
I plan to roll out the final release at the beginning of next week
if there are no major problems reported.
testsuite doesn't show regr
Hi you!
I'm a C++ developer on Linux. I want you show me the ways to install
both GCC 4.1.2 and GCC 3.2.3 on my Linux.
Thank you very much!
Hello all,
I am doing a private port in GCC 4.4.0. For my target the following
are the alignment requirements:
int - 4 bytes
short - 2 bytes
char - 1 byte
pointer - 4 bytes
stack pointer - 4 bytes
i am not able to implement the alignment for short.
The following is are the macros that i used fo
25 matches
Mail list logo
