Microsoft® writes:
> On July 3, 2009 I purchased a Hewlett-Packard HDX18t Premium Series
> Notebook PC with free upgrade for Windows 7. (Customized).
>
> Product: Hewlett-Packard HDX18t Premium Series Notebook PC
>
> • Genuine Windows Vista Home Premium with Service Pack 1 (32-bit)
> • Intel(R) C
Dear Sir or Madame:
On July 3, 2009 I purchased a Hewlett-Packard HDX18t Premium Series
Notebook PC with free upgrade for Windows 7. (Customized).
Product: Hewlett-Packard HDX18t Premium Series Notebook PC
• Genuine Windows Vista Home Premium with Service Pack 1 (32-bit)
• Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 01:52:51AM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
> Richard Guenther wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Jack Howarth
> > wrote:
> >> I am seeing a new failure on x86_64-apple-darwin10 in current gcc 4.4
> >> branch
> >> that wasn't present in the gcc 4.4.0 release. At -m32, th
Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>> I am seeing a new failure on x86_64-apple-darwin10 in current gcc 4.4
>> branch
>> that wasn't present in the gcc 4.4.0 release. At -m32, the testsuite
>> failure...
>>
>> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/2804-1.c
Snapshot gcc-4.3-20090712 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.3-20090712/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.3 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 09:55:13PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> > I am seeing a new failure on x86_64-apple-darwin10 in current gcc 4.4
> > branch
> > that wasn't present in the gcc 4.4.0 release. At -m32, the testsuite
> > failure...
>
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> I am seeing a new failure on x86_64-apple-darwin10 in current gcc 4.4 branch
> that wasn't present in the gcc 4.4.0 release. At -m32, the testsuite
> failure...
>
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/2804-1.c -O0 (test for excess errors)
>
>
I am seeing a new failure on x86_64-apple-darwin10 in current gcc 4.4 branch
that wasn't present in the gcc 4.4.0 release. At -m32, the testsuite failure...
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/2804-1.c -O0 (test for excess errors)
appears with the error logged as...
Executing on host:
/sw/src/
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 12:14 PM, NightStrike wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Steve
> Kargl wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 12:34:00PM -0400, NightStrike wrote:
>>> I have been trying to run the gfortran testsuite for a while now, and
>>> it keeps falling apart. Dominiq tried to find a
I've been working on bringing the VMS patches up to date. The VMS
Debugger requires a label at end prologue and begin_epilogue, and the
fact that final_scan_insn makes multiple calls to NOTE_INSN_EPILOGUE_BEG
for the same function makes this awkward. I suppose it could be case
that there are
> "Larry" == Larry Evans writes:
Larry> Based on:
Larry> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2008-02/msg00070.html
Larry> I guess there's no way to do that :(
If you use the cvs gdb you can do it using python.
In plain gdb you can do it by using set logging to set the output
file, writing the da
Hi,
I am looking to change the edge instrumentation for gcov. Instead of
just incrementing the edge count by 1, I want it to call an (external)
function which determines whether it should increment, and depending
on the answer, increment the edge.
I modified the tree_gen_edge_profiler function in
On 07/12/09 10:44, Larry Evans wrote:
[snip]
I was wondering if there was some way to set a convenience
variable:
[snip]
so that the breakpoints could conveniently be adjusted
after changes to the source code. IOW, something like:
set $lje_bp_line_correction = 5
set $lje_bp_line_next = (5
My */gcc/.gdbinit contains lines like:
#cp_parser_template_parameter:./* ...we have a template type parameter.
break parser.c:9730
condition $bpnum expand_location(input_location).line>(99)
commands
call expand_location(token->location)
call cp_lexer_start_debugging(parser->lexer)
end
Now, there
14 matches
Mail list logo