On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 03:50:12PM +1000, Ben Elliston wrote:
> According to svn annotate, it was you who authored the new 'offset
> outside bounds of constant string warning' warning in GCC (well, I think
> so, anyway). The compiler now complains about some code in the C++
> demangler:
>
> /home
Hi HJ
According to svn annotate, it was you who authored the new 'offset
outside bounds of constant string warning' warning in GCC (well, I think
so, anyway). The compiler now complains about some code in the C++
demangler:
/home/bje/source/gcc-trunk/libiberty/cplus-dem.c:2651: warning: offset ‘
Quoting DJ Delorie :
m32c has no problem loading a 24-bit register from a 32-bit memory
location.
The only truncsipsi2* alternative part that seems to match is Raa / Sd* .
Does that mean that Sd* is as good as m?
It had crossed my mind that you could use LEGITIMIZE_RELOAD_ADDRESS
to hide the
> From looking at the m32c machine description I got the impression
> that you can't directly load A_REGS in PSImode from a PSImode subreg
> of a SImode memory location, but maybe I was mistaken.
The big problem with m32c (--mcpu=m32c) is that pointers are 24 bits,
which doesn't correspond to an
Quoting DJ Delorie :
I suggest making reload reload the PSImode subreg instead, and
make the m32c machine description provide for a tertiary
reload so that the value can be loaded & truncated.
/
Don't know how to set up a tertiary reload (it's not documented
anywhere).
It's simply a seconda
> I suggest making reload reload the PSImode subreg instead, and
> make the m32c machine description provide for a tertiary
> reload so that the value can be loaded & truncated.
Don't know how to set up a tertiary reload (it's not documented
anywhere).
Is this the type of patch you're thining ab
Arthur Schwarz writes:
> In the following code fragment:
>
> # include
> # include
> # include
>
> using namespace std;
> void CommandLine(int argc, char** argv);
> int main(int argc, char** argv) {
>CommandLine(argc, argv[]);
>ifstream x.open(argv[1], ios:in);
>ofstream y.open(arg
Adayadil Thomas wrote:
Hi All,
I was wondering if gcc had a restricted version which would enable me
to write programs
with a subset of C language.
Any input is much appreciated.
Thanks !
What are you really looking for here? You can of course use any
subset of C you like, and compile and ru
Adayadil Thomas writes:
> I was wondering if gcc had a restricted version which would enable me
> to write programs
> with a subset of C language.
This question would be better directed to the gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list. Please take any followups to that mailing list.
No, gcc does not i
Jean Christophe Beyler writes:
> I've been working on the Machine description of my target and was
> wondering if you could help me out here.
>
> I've been trying to force GCC out of it's habit of generating this code :
> (insn 28 8 10 2 glob.c:13 (set (reg:DI 9 r9)
> (mem/s:DI (symbol_re
Hi All,
I was wondering if gcc had a restricted version which would enable me
to write programs
with a subset of C language.
Any input is much appreciated.
Thanks !
Dear all,
I've been working on the Machine description of my target and was
wondering if you could help me out here.
I've been trying to force GCC out of it's habit of generating this code :
(insn 28 8 10 2 glob.c:13 (set (reg:DI 9 r9)
(mem/s:DI (symbol_ref:DI ("data") )
[4 data+0 S8 A64]
Are there any plans to move the partial unrolling phase from
RTL to Tree-SSA?
The move would benefit from better (or easier to implement) Tree-SSA alias
analysis.
Alex
>
>
>
>
> --- On Wed, 4/22/09, Li Feng
> wrote:
>
> > From: Li Feng
> > Subject: [gSoc] [graphite] general plan for Auto
Thanks Ian. I appreciate your PROMPT response! Wow!
In anycase, I do have followup question. Should I ask you or ask gcc-help?
I have used "-fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage" options for compilation. Do I
still add --coverage for Linking as LINK_FLAGS?
I will try that whats the latest gcc we
Jayashree Ramani writes:
> Hello GCC Experts,
This message should have been sent to gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org rather than
g...@gcc.gnu.org. Please send any followups to gcc-help.
>
> I am an engineer trying to run gcov for our unit tests. We have a couple
> of DLLs and a few static libraries.
Hello GCC Experts,
I am an engineer trying to run gcov for our unit tests. We have a couple of
DLLs and a few static libraries.
I am having trouble linking the Test program that links in the DLLs. I have
the following in the Cmake files:
IF( "${COVERAGE}" STREQUAL "TRUE" )
LINK_D
Hi,
It's nice that the proposal 'Automatic parallelization in Graphite'
is accepted. Which means I will be working with great Graphtie
developers this summer, and trying to implement the project .
I have set up a blog for this project, which will mainly about this
project: 1. plans 2. what I have
On 06/04/2009, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> There is currently no way to get from the front page to the
>> gcc-4.4/changes.html page, should there be a "(changes)" link on the
>> front page until a release is added to the gcc-4.4/index.html page?
>
> I think
18 matches
Mail list logo
