Richard Guenther wrote:
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Raoul Gough wrote:
[snip]
I guess the situation is more complicated in C++, which has explicit
destructors. Consider the following example, which is getting closer to the
problem that originally got me interested in this subject:
voi
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Raoul Gough wrote:
> Richard Guenther wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Richard Guenther
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Raoul Gough
>>> wrote:
>>>
>
> [snip]
Here we pass into bar a pointer to int and double at the s
Richard Guenther wrote:
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Raoul Gough wrote:
[snip]
Here we pass into bar a pointer to int and double at the same storage
location. So now, if the compiler goes ahead and reorders the read and w
On Saturday 10 January 2009 19:06:48 Toon Moene wrote:
> Now, however, I want to congratulate Daniel Franke and Steve Kargle (who
> has been a GNU Fortran maintainer before) with their new status of
> "reviewer".
>
> Thanks Daniel and Steve, for (re-)joining the club !
Thanks Toon :)
Attached upd
Hi Sterling,
one thing I also recommend is sending regular test results to the
gcc-testresults list. I believe there were ~two sent in November,
none in December, and one this year so far which is a bit on the
low end. Several of us operate nightly or at least weekly testers,
and regular testing
