First, I'll preface this with "I'm probably doing something wrong."
I'm adding support to gfortran for the ERRMSG argument to [DE]ALLOCATE.
Here's, some code to demonstrate:
program a
call works
call fails
end program a
!
! Work with all optimization levels.
!
subroutine works
character(l
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 29, 2008, at 6:34 PM, yx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to compile SPEC2000 benchmark with gcc 4.1.2 (gfortran and
g++ were compiled successfully for gcc4.1.2.) However I got
compilation errors for 4 benchmarks in SPEC2000. The error messages
are listed
Hi,
I am trying to compile SPEC2000 benchmark with gcc 4.1.2 (gfortran and
g++ were compiled successfully for gcc4.1.2.) However I got
compilation errors for 4 benchmarks in SPEC2000. The error messages
are listed as follows:
176. gcc:
reorg.c: In function 'find_end_label'
reorg.c:831: error: inv
Forgot to reply all...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Brendon Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2008/11/30
Subject: Re: Functional Purity
To: David Fang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sounds like you want to (at least):
>
> 1) automatically qualify every declaration (including paramet
Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>> My biggest issue is that I don't see how I can compile-time evaluate the
>> following - or how to evaluate it at all:
>>
>> if (IEEE_SUPPORT_NAN(x)) &! should be always true (or false) on a
>> given system
>>
> See MODE_HAS_NANS etc. in real.h
>
Thanks. There I
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> While (a) and (b) can be easily handled in the front end, I don't see
> how I can handle the rest efficiently. Most parts are provided by
> fenv.h, for which I seemingly have to write a wrapper function (in
> libgfortran) as the typedefs and constants ca
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 09:41:30PM +0100, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>
> I'm thinking about how to implement Fortran 2003's IEEE support in
> gfortran. The IEEE allow
> a) To set an IEEE value (NaN, INF, etc.)
> b) Check whether a value is NaN, etc.
> c) To query for IEEE capabilities (IEEE_SUPPORT_NAN,
Hello,
I'm thinking about how to implement Fortran 2003's IEEE support in
gfortran. The IEEE allow
a) To set an IEEE value (NaN, INF, etc.)
b) Check whether a value is NaN, etc.
c) To query for IEEE capabilities (IEEE_SUPPORT_NAN, IEEE_SUPPORT_SQRT
(a sqrt() which has IEEE exception support), etc.
On 11/29/08 14:45:49, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > Agreed. The routine that creates the errant REG_EQUAL note is
> > lookup_as_function().
>
> Really? Doesn't it only retrieve a pre-existing REG_EQUAL note?
It retrieves an equivalent rtx constant, if it exists. Before the patch,
the constant that
> Agreed. The routine that creates the errant REG_EQUAL note is
> lookup_as_function().
Really? Doesn't it only retrieve a pre-existing REG_EQUAL note?
--
Eric Botcazou
On 11/29/08 10:37:33, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > The conditional jump instruction formed by instructions
> > 56 and 57 above is deleted because GCSE thinks that
> > (reg:SI 61 [ p$thread ]) is non-zero. It comes to this
> > conclusion when it propagates the
> >REG_EQUAL (const_int 4294967296 [0x
Hi,
I am working on mobile CE devices and I use cegcc (when it's possible) to
developp software.
There is one feature I miss with gcc called SEH exceptions and since I have
seen a recent post
about SEH x64 I think it's the right moment to talk about it.
First SEH exceptions exists in two kinds :
> The reason for posting this is to ask. Is there code in GCC that
> already does something "similar" in say one of the optimisation passes
> so i can get a look at how to get started on this?
ipa-pure-const.c
--
Eric Botcazou
Brendon Costa wrote:
> I want to use GCC to categorise "functional purity" in C++. My
> definition will differ from classic functional purity. In particular:
>
> A function is considered pure if it makes no changes to existing
> memory or program state. There may be a few exceptions to this rule
> The conditional jump instruction formed by instructions
> 56 and 57 above is deleted because GCSE thinks that
> (reg:SI 61 [ p$thread ]) is non-zero. It comes to this
> conclusion when it propagates the
>REG_EQUAL (const_int 4294967296 [0x1])
> value listed in instruction 25:
>
> (in
Thanks very much, Ian Lance Taylor .
I will go deeper into the makefiles.
16 matches
Mail list logo
