Re: GCC bug when using typeof

2008-10-20 Thread Peng Yu
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 9:09 PM, Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 7:04 PM, Peng Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I tried to compile the following program, but I got the following >> error. Is it a bug of GCC? Has it been fixed in a newer version GCC? >> >

RE: How to debug if scheduling in gcc is wrong?

2008-10-20 Thread Ye, Joey
袁立威 wrote: > Hi, I'm a guy working with gcc4.1.1 on itanium2. In my work, some > instrumentations are added by gcc. After instrumentation, all > specint2000 benchmarks except gzip can successfully run with > optimization flag -O3. There are some information list below: No answer from me but hopeful

Re: GCC bug when using typeof

2008-10-20 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 7:19 PM, Peng Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Could you please help explain what the difference between typeof and > decltype are? What are c++0x/g++0x modes? Well decltype is part of the C++0x standard (http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html, http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/s

Re: GCC bug when using typeof

2008-10-20 Thread Peng Yu
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 9:09 PM, Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 7:04 PM, Peng Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I tried to compile the following program, but I got the following >> error. Is it a bug of GCC? Has it been fixed in a newer version GCC? >> >

Re: GCC bug when using typeof

2008-10-20 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 7:04 PM, Peng Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to compile the following program, but I got the following > error. Is it a bug of GCC? Has it been fixed in a newer version GCC? > It is a bug in GCC but in later versions 4.3.0 and above, we get a sorry message:

GCC bug when using typeof

2008-10-20 Thread Peng Yu
Hi, I tried to compile the following program, but I got the following error. Is it a bug of GCC? Has it been fixed in a newer version GCC? g++ -Wall -W -pedantic -g -c -o main-g.o main.cc main.cc:57: internal compiler error: in write_type, at cp/mangle.c:1651 Please submit a full bug report, wit

Re: thread build on solaris

2008-10-20 Thread Edward Peschko
Eric, I'm not sure what you are trying to say here - that it should be fixed locally on my side at the level of the header file? Or something else? Fixing locally really isn't feasible as I'm working with a large amount of code (a whole code distribution, in fact) and who knows how many anachronis

Re: [PATCH]: GMP/MPFR in-tree build instructions [Was: Re: [PATCH]: bump minimum MPFR version, (includes some fortranbits)]

2008-10-20 Thread Kaveh R. Ghazi
From: "Tobias Schlüter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and @option{--with-gmp-include}. Alternatively, +if a GMP source ditribution is found in a subdirectory of you GCC +sources named @file{gmp}, it will be built together with [EMAIL PROTECTED] +Library is not installed in your default

Re: porting gcc

2008-10-20 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Aurélien Buhrig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > We are designing a 16-bit asynchronous microcontroller. I’ve already ported > bfd, binutils (including sid simulator) using cgen, and part of gdb (for asm > debug only) and we are now investigating the best way to have C compiler. > So my questions are

Re: out of date docs? (alpha/64bit vs. 32bit vs. cross)

2008-10-20 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#alpha-dec-osf > > "Note that since the Alpha is a 64-bit architecture, cross-compilers from > 32-bit machines will not generate code as efficient as that generated when > the compiler is running on a 64-bit machine becaus

Re: PR 12603 testcase

2008-10-20 Thread Janis Johnson
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 20:07 +0200, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote: > I would like to commit the following testcase to ensure we do not > regress for PR 12603. > > OK for trunk? > > 2008-10-20 Manuel López-Ibáñez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > PR 12603 > * gcc.dg/pr12603.c: New testcase. OK.

PR 12603 testcase

2008-10-20 Thread Manuel López-Ibáñez
I would like to commit the following testcase to ensure we do not regress for PR 12603. OK for trunk? 2008-10-20 Manuel López-Ibáñez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR 12603 * gcc.dg/pr12603.c: New testcase. Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr12603.c ===

porting gcc

2008-10-20 Thread Aurélien Buhrig
Hi, We are designing a 16-bit asynchronous microcontroller. I’ve already ported bfd, binutils (including sid simulator) using cgen, and part of gdb (for asm debug only) and we are now investigating the best way to have C compiler. So my questions are: 1- How much time do you think it will take to