Re: libstdc++, gdb and darwin

2008-10-03 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Jack Howarth wrote: > On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 08:29:40PM -0500, Peter O'Gorman wrote: >> Jack Howarth wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 11:31:13AM -0500, Peter O'Gorman wrote: Jack Howarth wrote: > Does anyone know why gdb appears to be unable to find the debug > information

Re: libstdc++, gdb and darwin

2008-10-03 Thread Jack Howarth
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 08:29:40PM -0500, Peter O'Gorman wrote: > Jack Howarth wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 11:31:13AM -0500, Peter O'Gorman wrote: > >> Jack Howarth wrote: > >>> Does anyone know why gdb appears to be unable to find the debug > >>> information > >>> for libstdc++ in gcc

Re: libstdc++, gdb and darwin

2008-10-03 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Jack Howarth wrote: > On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 11:31:13AM -0500, Peter O'Gorman wrote: >> Jack Howarth wrote: >>> Does anyone know why gdb appears to be unable to find the debug >>> information >>> for libstdc++ in gcc 4.3 and gcc trunk on darwin9? This has been reported >>> before >>> as... >

Re: libstdc++, gdb and darwin

2008-10-03 Thread Jack Howarth
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 11:31:13AM -0500, Peter O'Gorman wrote: > Jack Howarth wrote: > > Does anyone know why gdb appears to be unable to find the debug > > information > > for libstdc++ in gcc 4.3 and gcc trunk on darwin9? This has been reported > > before > > as... > > > > https://trac.ma

gcc-4.4-20081003 is now available

2008-10-03 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-4.4-20081003 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.4-20081003/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.4 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk

Re: RFC: function parm attribute: must_assign

2008-10-03 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > After upgrading to gcc-4.2.1 from a 3.4 version, I see that gcc now > complains about uninitialized variables even when their address is > passed to another function. This should only happen when gcc can see the called function and see that the value was used there bef

GCC FTP mirror

2008-10-03 Thread Thomas Lepping
Hi! I am inetested to setup a FTP mirror for the GCC distribution in Germany. How much disk space/bandwith does it need to provide a mirror? is it also possible to mirror through rsync? Thanks and best regards. Thomas Lepping

Re: real.h: REAL_VALUE_TO_TARGET_DOUBLE

2008-10-03 Thread Omar Torres
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Richard Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The size of the C type "double" is controlled by DOUBLE_TYPE_SIZE, > not the size of the compiler mode "DFmode". This macro is referring > to the latter -- a double-precision floating point mode. > > > r~ > Richard, I

Re: real.h: REAL_VALUE_TO_TARGET_DOUBLE

2008-10-03 Thread Richard Henderson
Omar Torres wrote: On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 11:59 PM, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "Omar Torres" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Shouldn't this macro: #define REAL_VALUE_TO_TARGET_DOUBLE(IN, OUT) \ real_to_target (OUT, &(IN), mode_for_size (64, MODE_FLOAT, 0)) be using DOUBLE_TYP

Re: real.h: REAL_VALUE_TO_TARGET_DOUBLE

2008-10-03 Thread Omar Torres
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 11:59 PM, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Omar Torres" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Shouldn't this macro: >> #define REAL_VALUE_TO_TARGET_DOUBLE(IN, OUT) \ >> real_to_target (OUT, &(IN), mode_for_size (64, MODE_FLOAT, 0)) >> >> be using DOUBLE_TYPE_SIZE

RFC: function parm attribute: must_assign

2008-10-03 Thread jbbachky
After upgrading to gcc-4.2.1 from a 3.4 version, I see that gcc now complains about uninitialized variables even when their address is passed to another function. Now that we get a warning about that variable being possibly initialized, I'm forced to add an instruction or two to initialize it (

Re: IA64 HP-UX bug with C++ inline change (r138150)

2008-10-03 Thread Steve Ellcey
I noticed that in start_cleanup_fn the statements: DECL_INLINE (fndecl) = 1; DECL_DECLARED_INLINE_P (fndecl) = 1; were removed. DECL_INLINE no longer exists but DECL_DECLARED_INLINE_P still exists and if I put that one back into start_cleanup_fn (in cp/decl.c) my small test case stops outputi

Re: Extending a backend

2008-10-03 Thread Gobaan_Raveendran
I basically need to test the retarget ability of named address spaces, and it was determined that the best way to do this was to attempt to have the SPU implementation spit out a few assembly mnemonics that resemble what our architecture uses to handle multiple address spaces(hence the loads and s

Re: gcc source: how can access asmspec_tree in function push_parm_decl

2008-10-03 Thread Bernd Roesch
Hello Ian On 03.10.08, you wrote: >> but the func >> >> push_parm_decl >> >> have no parameter asmspec_tree. > > It shouldn't need one. > > I'm not sure what the semantics of this should be. Are you trying to > change the calling convention for a function? Should it change what > callers

variable table in backend

2008-10-03 Thread Thomas A.M. Bernard
Hi, Is there a structure/array/macro to access all the variables (something like a variable table) in the back-end after the instantiation of the virtual registers (vregs pass from function.c) ? Some info about variable + its virtual register and so on. Thanks, Thomas