Yuhong Bao wrote:
> and Apple uses GCC (which is now under GPLv3) and Mac OS X on it.
> Unfortunately, the iPhone is incompatible with GPLv3, if you want more see
> the link I mentioned.
Apple does not use a GPLv3 version of GCC. All GPL sources used in the
iPhone, are, as far as I know, available
> Off-topic, but I feel this is important, since Apple contributed to gcc,
> and it is licensed under GPLv3 now.
The license of GCC does not matter, unless the iPhone includes a copy of
GCC's binaries for a recent-enough version. In which case, of course,
Apple would be violating the GPLv3 and yo
1) This is offtopic.
Yeah, but I want to bring this up because I can tell it is affecting GCC
development.
From http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-02/msg00523.html:
"> If someone steps forward, are you allowed to follow the patches list
We can't read the patches nor gcc list.
and give feedback an
"Yuhong Bao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Off-topic, but I feel this is important, since Apple contributed to gcc, and
> it is licensed under GPLv3 now.
> In particular, this was inspired by this thread on the gcc mailing lists:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-02/msg00520.html
> Notice that I CC
Off-topic, but I feel this is important, since Apple contributed to gcc, and
it is licensed under GPLv3 now.
In particular, this was inspired by this thread on the gcc mailing lists:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-02/msg00520.html
Notice that I CCed an Apple-internal email address extracted from t
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 05:51:23PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> Mark Mitchell wrote:
> >Is that desirable? Type-based alias analysis should be able to take
> >advantage of the difference between them; a "char **" and a "signed char
> >**" cannot point at the same thing, for example.
>
> They can
Mark Mitchell wrote:
Is that desirable? Type-based alias analysis should be able to take
advantage of the difference between them; a "char **" and a "signed char
**" cannot point at the same thing, for example.
They can. In C++, a char* (or unsigned char*) can alias anything, and
any signed/
Hello All
On the MELT branch, I need sometimes that cc1 be run even if there is no
input files. This is an unusual mode, but sometimes needed (This
actually is needed to have MELT lisp files translated into C; for
reasons not explained here, this is a special mode of my ./cc1 which
does that;
> NEGATE_EXPR on an unsigned type is fully defined. It's what you
> should get when you say "unsigned int i, j; ...; i = - j;".
I didn't say it was undefined, I said it seemed wrong. Esp since the
example starts with a plain "int" value.
> I think the problem you are facing may be that POINTER
