On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 12:26 AM, Omar Torres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mohamed Shafi wrote:
>> Hello Omar,
>>
>> I saw your mail to gcc mailing list regarding splitting of HImode
>> patterns into QImode patterns. I am also involved in porting. My
>> problem is similar to yours. But i have to sp
2008/5/23 Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Recent gcc is capable of generating pure Thumb thunks (and always does so for
> Thumb-2).
I noticed that in top-of-trunk but I am working thumb, not thumb2.
> Thumb branches have extremely limited range, and you can't clobber any low
> registers. A co
On Fri, 23 May 2008, Sebastian Pop wrote:
> AMD Developer Central has generously donated two bi-quad core
> machines with the latest AMD Opteron 8354 "Barcelona B3" processors
> and 16GB of RAM to the GCC Compile Farm
> project for use by free software developers. Hosting is donated
> by http://ww
On Saturday 24 May 2008, Doug Kwan (關振德) wrote:
> I saw that MI thunks are always issued in ARM mode. Is there a
> specific reason?
Recent gcc is capable of generating pure Thumb thunks (and always does so for
Thumb-2).
> I think I can replace a
> 20-byte ARM MI thunk with a 4 bytes THUMB equiv
I saw that MI thunks are always issued in ARM mode. Is there a
specific reason? I browse the EABI and its supplement and there is no
mentioning of how thunks are implemented. I think I can replace a
20-byte ARM MI thunk with a 4 bytes THUMB equivalent when the thunkee
is also in THUMB mode. Is th
Hi Jan, Uros,
i386.md has
(define_insn "*sse_prologue_save_insn"
[(set (mem:BLK (plus:DI (match_operand:DI 0 "register_operand" "R")
(match_operand:DI 4 "const_int_operand" "n")))
(unspec:BLK [(reg:DI 21)
(reg:DI 22)
(r
Snapshot gcc-4.4-20080523 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.4-20080523/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.4 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk
ANTHONY APPLEYARD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a copy of the Gnu C/C++ compiler which is of about Jan/Feb 2000
> vintage. Please where can I download a current version? I have searched
> in http://www.gnu.org and its dependent page.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/
> (0) Please where is the emai
> I don't think you can tell that, but maybe look into tree-ssa-address.c where
> it asks the target for costs via building some rtx-en.
Ok, here's something... I adjusted my address_cost hook to figure
costs of offsets more accurately, and even though it only tests
"offset" vs "no offset", it do
> I don't think you can tell that, but maybe look into tree-ssa-address.c where
> it asks the target for costs via building some rtx-en.
I've got a target_address_cost hook, but it's never passed an RTX with
a negative displacement.
Mohamed Shafi wrote:
> Hello Omar,
>
> I saw your mail to gcc mailing list regarding splitting of HImode
> patterns into QImode patterns. I am also involved in porting. My
> problem is similar to yours. But i have to split SImode patterns into
> HImode patterns.
>
> I am sure that you have modified
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 7:21 PM, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 09:03:26AM -0400, Paul M. Dubuc wrote:
>> I have been trying to find a list of bugs that have been fixed in this
>> release without any success. How do I find this information about a
>> given release?
>
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 12:15:09PM -0500, Sebastian Pop wrote:
> We would like to have the name of the department that provided these
> machines in the announce. Is the following wording acceptable?
>
> AMD Developer Central has generously donated two bi-quad core
> machines with the latest AMD O
[Reply-to set]
Please remove gcc-announce from your responses to this thread.
I'm getting tired of rejecting all of the non-announce email.
cgf
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 10:21:52AM -0700, Joe Buck wrote:
>On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 09:03:26AM -0400, Paul M. Dubuc wrote:
>> I have been trying to find
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 09:03:26AM -0400, Paul M. Dubuc wrote:
> I have been trying to find a list of bugs that have been fixed in this
> release without any success. How do I find this information about a
> given release?
Others have suggested reading ChangeLog files, but there's a better way.
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 11:39 AM, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, the FSF has rather restrictive linking rules, so I don't think the
> patch can include the link to AMD's site (the link to INRIA should be
> fine).
>
> Since we can't give AMD a link, we could at least list them first.
>
> Please how do I set environment variable DJGPP? What should I set it
> to?
Your best bet for DJGPP-related questions is still the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list (or comp.os.msdos.djgpp newsgroup).
See http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/ for details.
The DJGPP ftp sites and mirrors have current gcc b
I have a copy of the Gnu C/C++ compiler which is of about Jan/Feb 2000
vintage. Please where can I download a current version? I have searched
in http://www.gnu.org and its dependent page.
(0) Please where is the email group or forum to ask queries about Gnu
C/C++?
I now have Windows Vista. I nee
Andrew Haley wrote:
Paul M. Dubuc wrote:
Andrew Haley wrote:
Paul M. Dubuc wrote:
Joseph S. Myers wrote:
GCC 4.2.4 has been released.
GCC 4.2.4 is a bug-fix release, containing fixes for regressions in
GCC 4.2.3 relative to previous GCC releases. This release i
> You may have seen this warning from the memory consumption tester:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2008-05/msg00041.html
>
> ... related to the recent identifier GC patch.
>
> I looked into this a little. My theory is that this is an artifact of
> how the tester collects its data. I
Paul M. Dubuc wrote:
> Andrew Haley wrote:
>> Paul M. Dubuc wrote:
>>
>>> Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>>>
GCC 4.2.4 has been released.
GCC 4.2.4 is a bug-fix release, containing fixes for regressions in
GCC 4.2.3 relative to previous GCC releases. This release is
availabl
Andrew Haley wrote:
Paul M. Dubuc wrote:
Joseph S. Myers wrote:
GCC 4.2.4 has been released.
GCC 4.2.4 is a bug-fix release, containing fixes for regressions in
GCC 4.2.3 relative to previous GCC releases. This release is
available from the FTP servers listed at:
http://www.gnu.org
> Uh, so sizetype is 32bit but pointer displacements are 24bit? :(
Worse. sizetype is 16bit but pointer displacements are 24bit. There
are no 24bit address registers, nor are there enough 24bit math
opcodes to satisfy gcc (without switching to 32bit emulated math,
which is REALLY slow).
It's
Paul M. Dubuc wrote:
> Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>> GCC 4.2.4 has been released.
>>
>> GCC 4.2.4 is a bug-fix release, containing fixes for regressions in
>> GCC 4.2.3 relative to previous GCC releases. This release is
>> available from the FTP servers listed at:
>>
>> http://www.gnu.org/order/ftp.
Joseph S. Myers wrote:
GCC 4.2.4 has been released.
GCC 4.2.4 is a bug-fix release, containing fixes for regressions in GCC
4.2.3 relative to previous GCC releases. This release is available from
the FTP servers listed at:
http://www.gnu.org/order/ftp.html
Please do not contact me direct
A first release candidate for GCC 4.3.1 is available from
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.3.1-RC-20080523
and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 135793.
I have sofar bootstrapped and tested the release candidate on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
The branch is
Hello everyone,
I need to specify constraints for registers used in the memory
operands in a load pattern. For these the following are the things
that i have done.
#define CONSTRAINT_LEN(CHAR,STR) \
((CHAR) == 'R' ? 3 \
: DEFAULT_CONSTRAINT_LEN(CHAR,STR))
#define EXTRA_MEMORY_CO
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 5:07 AM, DJ Delorie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> (yet another m32c-related problem)
>
> Something in ivopts is converting this:
>
> ap.1_5 = ap_38 + 2;
> ap.2_6 = (struct tiny *) ap_38;
> SR.8_15 = ap.2_6->c;
>
> to this:
>
> ap.1_5 = ap_38 + 2;
> SR.8_15 = MEM[base:
Hi Omar,
On Thu, 22 May 2008, Omar Torres wrote:
> 2- Currently, (1) is the only thing I have run cross. I am sure there
> are other issues that those of you with more experience have already
> discovered and solve. Any other Dos/Don'ts or tips/tricks when posting
> to GCC ML?
http://gcc.gnu.org/
The GCC 4.3 branch is now frozen in preparation for a 4.3.1 release
candidate and the 4.3.1 release about a week after that. All checkins
to the branch require explicit approval from one of the RMs.
Thanks,
Richard.
30 matches
Mail list logo
