Re: [PATCH, DOC] PR 31549: move -frtl-abstract-sequences description

[ gcc-patches -> gcc ] On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: > The last time I tried this on ARM it didn't work because there were > ICEs and it might have been fixed by now. > > However searching on bugzilla found me these . > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33009 > htt

Re: AVR port broken on 4.3 20080215 snapshot

As Weddington, Eric wrote: > 1. I've never been able to get svn (Cygwin command line client) to > fully checkout gcc. By contrast, cvs works fine for me for binutils. SVN ought to work fine without Cygwin, on plain Windows. Just FWIW... I've only seen issues with some proxies that don't route al

iNGYEN LETOLTES!

Szia! Emlékszel amikor arról beszéltem hogy meg fog nyílni Magyarország legjobb letöltõ oldala? Na, ha igen, akkor itt a link. Jó szorakozást! :) http://href.hu/x/4pnj

Ada: building 4.3 cross-gnattools with gcc-4.2.1

I am trying to build a cross compiler based on the current 4.3 snapshot with a native compiler based on V4.2.1 (Host=mingw, target=avr). Building the cross-gnattools fails with some errors about type mismatch in make.adb (system.strings.string_access vs. gnat.strings.string_access). 1) Is it s

RE: AVR port broken on 4.3 20080215 snapshot

> -Original Message- > From: Richard Guenther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2008 12:34 PM > To: Weddington, Eric > Cc: GCC; Denis Chertykov; Anatoly Sokolov; Joerg Wunsch; Lamo, Jo Inge > Subject: Re: AVR port broken on 4.3 20080215 snapshot > > On Feb 16, 20

Re: cc1

On Feb 16, 2008 12:38 PM, Dasarath Weeratunge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When I use cc1 directly it outputs a whole lot of text like: > is there an option to surpress this? -quiet . -- Pinski

cc1

When I use cc1 directly it outputs a whole lot of text like: gnu_dev_major gnu_dev_minor gnu_dev_makedev stat lstat fstat fstatat mknod mknodat stat64 lstat64 fstat64 fstatat64 shwi_to_double_int uhwi_to_double_int double_int_zero_p double_int_one_p double_int_minus_one_p double_int_equal_p VEC_t

Re: AVR port broken on 4.3 20080215 snapshot

On Feb 16, 2008 8:10 PM, Weddington, Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi All > > 4.3 20080215 snapshot fails to build for the AVR, whereas last week's > snapshot 20080207 builds just fine. Filed as bug #35218: > > > I know that the AVR target is

AVR port broken on 4.3 20080215 snapshot

Hi All 4.3 20080215 snapshot fails to build for the AVR, whereas last week's snapshot 20080207 builds just fine. Filed as bug #35218: I know that the AVR target is neither a primary or secondary platform (though we'd like to pitch for secondary

Re: Mainline Regression in gcc.target/i386/pr32268.c

On Feb 16, 2008 8:01 PM, Kaveh R. Ghazi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: "Richard Guenther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> You can trigger the bug in a regular pass by applying the following > >> noinline patch to the testcase. Thoughts? > > > > How does it break? It works for me with noinline and

Re: Mainline Regression in gcc.target/i386/pr32268.c

From: "Richard Guenther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> You can trigger the bug in a regular pass by applying the following noinline patch to the testcase. Thoughts? How does it break? It works for me with noinline and with -fPIC. Richard. I'm running with mainline revision 132367 on x86_64-unknown-l

Re: Mainline Regression in gcc.target/i386/pr32268.c

On Feb 16, 2008 10:57 AM, Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You need to patch the testcase. The change was somehow trivial > > (effectively changed return mode of TFmode soft-fp compare from "long" > > into __libgcc_cmp_return__ mode, which should be the same). I'll look > > into it t

Re: Mainline Regression in gcc.target/i386/pr32268.c

On Feb 16, 2008 7:52 PM, Uros Bizjak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Richard Guenther wrote: > > >> This broke on x86_64 in the last day or so, I thought maybe you might know > >> what happened. (You touched config/i386 FP stuff recently.) I'm seeing a > >> regression in gcc.target/i386/pr32268.c as

Re: Mainline Regression in gcc.target/i386/pr32268.c

Richard Guenther wrote: This broke on x86_64 in the last day or so, I thought maybe you might know what happened. (You touched config/i386 FP stuff recently.) I'm seeing a regression in gcc.target/i386/pr32268.c as seen here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg01108.html Right n

Re: Bootstrap is broken for i386-darwin8.10.1

On Feb 16, 2008 7:18 PM, Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > Even though darwin9 works, dariwn 8.10 is broken while build libjava: > > /Users/apinski/src/local/gcc/objdir/i386-apple-darwin8.10.1/libjava/.libs/libgcj.dylib(single > module) definition of java resource sun/rmi/rmic/mess

Re: Mainline Regression in gcc.target/i386/pr32268.c

On Feb 16, 2008 6:50 PM, Kaveh R. GHAZI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Uros, > > This broke on x86_64 in the last day or so, I thought maybe you might know > what happened. (You touched config/i386 FP stuff recently.) I'm seeing a > regression in gcc.target/i386/pr32268.c as seen here: > http://

Bootstrap is broken for i386-darwin8.10.1

Hi, Even though darwin9 works, dariwn 8.10 is broken while build libjava: /Users/apinski/src/local/gcc/objdir/i386-apple-darwin8.10.1/libjava/.libs/libgcj.dylib(single module) definition of java resource sun/rmi/rmic/messages.properties ./.libs/libgcj-tools.dylib(single module) definition of jav

Mainline Regression in gcc.target/i386/pr32268.c

Hi Uros, This broke on x86_64 in the last day or so, I thought maybe you might know what happened. (You touched config/i386 FP stuff recently.) I'm seeing a regression in gcc.target/i386/pr32268.c as seen here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg01108.html Right now the execute fa

Re: LLVM 2.2

> Another is that it supports Ada (32 bit x86 on linux only for the moment) > and Fortran to some extent. I'm currently adding build instructions for > these two languages to http://llvm.org/docs/CFEBuildInstrs.html (should > be up in a day or two). The release notes detail what works and what >